ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2013
Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
- Cochlear tuning estimates from level ratio functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.International journal of audiology · 2021Article
- Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017Review
- The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.Biomedical engineering online · 2016Article
- Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015Article
- Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015Article
- Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015Article
- Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.International journal of audiology · 2015Article
- Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015Article
- An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system.Biomedical engineering online · 2014Article
- Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2014Article
- Cochlear Tuning in Early Aging Estimated with Three Methods.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.Trends in hearingArticle
- Objective Assessment System for Hearing Prediction Based on Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As shown by the work of Kemp and Chum in 1980, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) have potential to objectively estimate behaviorally measured tuning curves. To date, this potential has not been tested. This study aims to do so by comparing SFOAE STCs and behavioral measures of tuning (simultaneous masking psychophysical tuning curves, PTCs) in 10 normal-hearing listeners for frequency ranges centered around 1,000 and 4,000 Hz at low probe levels. Additionally, SFOAE STCs were collected for varying conditions (probe level and suppression criterion) to identify the optimal parameters for comparison with behavioral data and to evaluate how these conditions affect the features of SFOAE STCs. SFOAE STCs qualitatively resembled PTCs: they demonstrated band-pass characteristics and asymmetric shapes with steeper high-frequency sides than low, but unlike PTCs they were consistently tuned to frequencies just above the probe frequency. When averaged across subjects the shapes of SFOAE STCs and PTCs showed agreement for most recording conditions, suggesting that PTCs are predominantly shaped by the frequency-selective filtering and suppressive effects of the cochlea. Individual SFOAE STCs often demonstrated irregular shapes (e.g., "double-tips"), particularly for the 1,000-Hz probe, which were not observed for the same subject's PTC. These results show the limited utility of SFOAE STCs to assess tuning in an individual. The irregularly shaped SFOAE STCs may be attributed to contributions from SFOAE sources distributed over a region of the basilar membrane extending beyond the probe characteristic place, as suggested by a repeatable pattern of SFOAE residual phase shifts observed in individual data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.