Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24013722›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2013

ΔNp63 regulates select routes of reprogramming via multiple mechanisms.

E M Alexandrova, O Petrenko, A Nemajerova, R-A Romano, S Sinha, U M Moll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Master regulatory role of p63 in epidermal development and disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  5. p53 switches off pluripotency on differentiation.Stem cell research & therapy · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. How Does p73 Cause Neuronal Defects?Molecular neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  8. ΔNp63 regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and migration in the BL2 subtype of basal-like breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. MicroRNAs and p63 in epithelial stemness.Cell death and differentiation · 2015
    Article
  15. TAp73 promotes anabolism.Oncotarget · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E M AlexandrovaDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
O Petrenko
A Nemajerova
R-A Romano
S Sinha
U M Moll
Stony Brook University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

The role of p63 and p73 in cancerR01CA093853 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MOLL, UTE MARTHA · 2002 to 2012
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA93853NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cells can be converted into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by forced expression of various combinations of transcription factors, but the molecular mechanisms of reprogramming are poorly understood. Specifically, evidence that the reprogramming process can take many distinct routes only begins to emerge. It is definitively established that p53 deficiency greatly enhances reprogramming, revealing p53's barrier function for induced pluripotency, but the role of its homologs p63 and p73 are unknown. Here we report that in stark contrast to p53, p73 has no role in reprogramming. However, p63 is an enabling (rather than a barrier) factor for Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 (OSK) and Oct4 and Sox2 (OS), but not for Oct4 and Klf4 (OK) reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Specifically, p63 is essential during reprogramming for maximum efficiency, albeit not for the ability to reprogram per se, and is dispensable for maintaining stability and pluripotency of established iPSC colonies. ΔNp63, but not TAp63, is the principal isoform involved. Loss of p63 can affect reprogramming via several mechanisms such as reduced expression of mesenchymal-epithelial transition and pluripotency genes, hypoproliferation and loss of the most reprogrammable cell populations. During OSK and OS reprogramming, different mechanisms seem to be critical, such as regulation of epithelial and pluripotency genes in OSK reprogramming versus regulation of proliferation in OS reprogramming. Finally, our data reveal three different routes of reprogramming by OSK, OS or OK, based on their differential p63 requirements for iPSC efficiency and pluripotency marker expression. This supports the concept that many distinct routes of reprogramming exist.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsCell ProliferationEmbryo, MammalianFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMiceOctamer Transcription Factor-3PhosphoproteinsProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsKlf4 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3PhosphoproteinsProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTrp63 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID24013722
PMCPMC3824590
OpenAlexW2045036569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.