Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24013427›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2013

Wee1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy.

Khanh Do, James H Doroshow, Shivaani Kummar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Targeting WEE1 Kinase for Breast Cancer Therapeutics: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Khanh DoCenter for Cancer Research; National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD USA.
James H Doroshow
Shivaani Kummar
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Phase 01 Clinical TrialsZIABC011078 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DOROSHOW, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$9.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wee1, a protein kinase, regulates the G 2 checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Preclinical studies have elucidated the role of wee1 in DNA damage repair and the stabilization of replication forks, supporting the validity of wee1 inhibition as a viable therapeutic target in cancer. MK-1775, a selective and potent small-molecule inhibitor of wee1, is under clinical development as a potentiator of DNA damage caused by cytotoxic chemotherapies. We present a review of the role of wee1 in the cell cycle and DNA replication and summarize the clinical development to date of this novel class of anticancer agents.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Cycle ProteinsClinical Trials as TopicDNA DamageDNA RepairG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrazolesPyrimidinesPyrimidinonesRNA InterferenceadavosertibAntineoplastic AgentsCell Cycle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrazolesPyrimidinesPyrimidinonesWEE1 protein, humancell cyclecyclin-dependent kinaseDNA damageG2 checkpointMK 1775

Identifiers

PMID24013427
PMCPMC3865011
OpenAlexW1973388314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.