ArticleBehavioural processes2014
Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.
Article in Behavioural processes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hazard function effects on promoting self-control in variable interval time-based interventions in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2021Article
- Is the scalar property of interval timing preserved after hippocampus lesions?Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Numerical averaging in mice.Animal cognition · 2021Article
- Scalar timing in memory: A temporal map in the hippocampus.Journal of theoretical biology · 2018Article
- A Rescorla-Wagner drift-diffusion model of conditioning and timing.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Learning about the CS during latent inhibition: Preexposure enhances temporal control.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2016Article
- Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes.Acta psychologica · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rats were trained in either a 30 s peak-interval procedure, or a 15-45 s variable interval peak procedure with a uniform distribution (Exp 1) or a ramping probability distribution (Exp 2). Rats in all groups showed peak shaped response functions centered around 30 s, with the uniform group having an earlier and broader peak response function and rats in the ramping group having a later peak function as compared to the single duration group. The changes in these mean functions, as well as the statistics from single trial analyses, can be better captured by a model of timing in which memory is represented by a single, average, delay to reinforcement compared to one in which all durations are stored as a distribution, such as the complete memory model of Scalar Expectancy Theory or a simple associative model. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Associative and Temporal Learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.