Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24012397›Full record

ReviewSurgical oncology clinics of North America2013

Targeting the p53 pathway.

Vita M Golubovskaya, William G Cance

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical oncology clinics of North America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NLRC4, inflammation and colorectal cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Protective Effect of the Polysaccharides fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Sex differences in cancer mechanisms.Biology of sex differences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Oncology letters · 2018
    Article
  11. Chemical Variations on the p53 Reactivation Theme.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unveiling the Paradoxical Nature of Autophagy in Cancer Cell Fate.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vita M GolubovskayaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14127, USA; CureFAKtor Pharmaceuticals, 14 Rock Dove Lane, Orchard Park, Buffalo, NY 1427, USA.
William G Cance
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

FOCAL ADHESION KINASE--TUMOR BIOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICSR01CA065910 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARLOWE, TIMOTHY A · 1996 to 2019
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA65910NCI NIH HHS R01 CA065910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article summarizes data on translational studies to target the p53 pathway in cancer. It describes the functions of the p53 and Mdm-2 signaling pathways, and discusses current therapeutic approaches to target p53 pathways, including reactivation of p53. In addition, direct interaction and colocalization of the p53 and focal adhesion kinase proteins in cancer cells have been demonstrated, and different approaches to target this interaction are reviewed. This is a broad review of p53 function as it relates to the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of cancers.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsTumor Suppressor Protein p53ApoptosisFAKMdm-2p53Survival

Identifiers

PMID24012397
PMCPMC3810242
OpenAlexW2072702976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.