Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24012326›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2014

Progress update: fluid and imaging biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

Courtney L Sutphen, Anne M Fagan, David M Holtzman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Courtney L SutphenDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Anne M FaganDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
David M HoltzmanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Development Biology (DMH), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: holtzman@neuro.wustl.edu.

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P01-AG03991NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS P50-AG05681PHS HHS P01-26276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing health crisis around the world. Although significant progress has been made in our understanding of AD pathogenesis, there is currently no effective treatment to delay onset or prevent the disease. The focus has now shifted to the identification and treatment of AD in the early clinical stages as well as before cognitive symptoms emerge-during the long preclinical stage. It is possible that diagnosis of individuals with AD will be more accurate when clinical symptoms and signs are combined with biomarkers, which can improve both the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of AD and its differentiation from the other neurodegenerative diseases. This review discusses fluid and imaging biomarkers that have shown promise in such areas, as well as some of the current challenges that face the field.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkercerebrospinal fluiddiagnosisneuroimagingprognosis

Identifiers

PMID24012326
PMCPMC3947397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.