Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24011653›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Neurology2013

Association between repeat sizes and clinical and pathological characteristics in carriers of C9ORF72 repeat expansions (Xpansize-72): a cross-sectional cohort study.

Marka van Blitterswijk, Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, Melissa E Murray, Michael G Heckman, Nancy N Diehl, Patricia H Brown, Matthew C Baker, NiCole A Finch, Peter O Bauer and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Wild-typemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. The spectrum ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. NAR molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neurology. Genetics · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marka van BlitterswijkDepartment of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez
Ellis Niemantsverdriet
Melissa E Murray
Michael G Heckman
Nancy N Diehl
Patricia H Brown
Matthew C Baker
NiCole A Finch
Peter O Bauer
Geidy Serrano
Thomas G Beach
Keith A Josephs
David S Knopman
Ronald C Petersen
Bradley F Boeve
Neill R Graff-Radford
Kevin B Boylan
Leonard Petrucelli
Dennis W Dickson
Rosa Rademakers
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USBanner Sun Health Research Institute · USWinnMed · US

Funding

THE PGRN/TDP-43 AXIS IN ALZHEIMER?S DISEASE AND NEURODEGENERATIONP50AG016574 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BU, GUOJUN · 1999 to 2018
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
National Brain and Tissue Resource for Parkinson's Disease and Related DisordersU24NS072026 · NINDS · BANNER SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BEACH, THOMAS G · 2011 to 2015
$7.8M
The genetics of chromosome 17q21-linked tau-negative FTDR01AG026251 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI PETRUCELLI, LEONARD · 2006 to 2014
$1.9M
GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansions in neurodegenerative diseaseR01NS080882 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI RADEMAKERS, ROSA · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG19610NIA NIH HHS P50 AG 016574NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016574NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026251NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080882NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS072026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHexanucleotide repeat expansions in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) are the most common known genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and motor neuron disease (MND). We assessed whether expansion size is associated with disease severity or phenotype.

methodsWe did a cross-sectional Southern blot characterisation study (Xpansize-72) in a cohort of individuals with FTD, MND, both these diseases, or no clinical phenotype. All participants had GGGGCC repeat expansions in C9ORF72, and high quality DNA was available from one or more of the frontal cortex, cerebellum, or blood. We used Southern blotting techniques and densitometry to estimate the repeat size of the most abundant expansion species. We compared repeat sizes between different tissues using Wilcoxon rank sum and Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and between disease subgroups using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. We assessed the association of repeat size with age at onset and age at collection using a Spearman's test of correlation, and assessed the association between repeat size and survival after disease onset using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

findingsWe included 84 individuals with C9ORF72 expansions: 35 had FTD, 16 had FTD and MND, 30 had MND, and three had no clinical phenotype. We focused our analysis on three major tissue subgroups: frontal cortex (available from 41 patients [21 with FTD, 11 with FTD and MND, and nine with MND]), cerebellum (40 patients [20 with FTD, 12 with FTD and MND, and eight with MND]), and blood (47 patients [15 with FTD, nine with FTD and MND, and 23 with MND] and three carriers who had no clinical phenotype). Repeat lengths in the cerebellum were smaller (median 12·3 kb [about 1667 repeat units], IQR 11·1-14·3) than those in the frontal cortex (33·8 kb [about 5250 repeat units], 23·5-44·9; p<0·0001) and those in blood (18·6 kb [about 2717 repeat units], 13·9-28·1; p=0·0002). Within these tissues, we detected no difference in repeat length between disease subgroups (cerebellum p=0·96, frontal cortex p=0·27, blood p=0·10). In the frontal cortex of patients with FTD, repeat length correlated with age at onset (r=0·63; p=0·003) and age at sample collection (r=0·58; p=0·006); we did not detect such a correlation in samples from the cerebellum or blood. When assessing cerebellum samples from the overall cohort, survival after disease onset was 4·8 years (IQR 3·0-7·4) in the group with expansions greater than 1467 repeat units (the 25th percentile of repeat lengths) versus 7·4 years (6·3-10·9) in the group with smaller expansions (HR 3·27, 95% CI 1·34-7·95; p=0·009).

interpretationWe detected substantial variation in repeat sizes between samples from the cerebellum, frontal cortex, and blood, and longer repeat sizes in the cerebellum seem to be associated with a survival disadvantage. Our findings indicate that expansion size does affect disease severity, which--if replicated in other cohorts--could be relevant for genetic counselling.

fundingThe ALS Therapy Alliance, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute on Aging, the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Arizona Biomedical Research Commission, and the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.

Indexed as

AgedAge of OnsetC9orf72 ProteinCerebellumCohort StudiesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDNA Repeat ExpansionFemaleFrontal LobeFrontotemporal DementiaGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor Neuron DiseaseC9orf72 ProteinC9orf72 protein, humanProteins

Identifiers

PMID24011653
PMCPMC3879782
OpenAlexW2041964860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.