Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24010992›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Nitrates and bone turnover (NABT) - trial to select the best nitrate preparation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Roxana C Bucur, Lauren S Reid, Celeste J Hamilton, Steven R Cummings, Sophie A Jamal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01387672 (Nitrates and Bone Turnover), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01387672 phase3completednot on this map

Nitrates and Bone Turnover (NABT): Trial to Select the Best Nitrate Preparation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2011 to 2014Enrolled265ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsNitrates (NABT Main trial), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nitrate Medications, Fractures, and Change in Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: Results from the Women's Health Initiative.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roxana C BucurWomen's College Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sophie.jamal@utoronto.ca.
Lauren S Reid
Celeste J Hamilton
Steven R Cummings
Sophie A Jamal
University of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAThe Coordinating Center · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP119423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganic nitrates uncouple bone turnover, improve bone mineral density, and improve trabecular and cortical components of bone. These changes in turnover, strength and geometry may translate into an important reduction in fractures. However, before proceeding with a large fracture trial, there is a need to identify the nitrate formulation that has both the greatest efficacy (with regards to bone turnover markers) and gives the fewest headaches. Ascertaining which nitrate formulation this may be is the purpose of the current study. METHODS AND

designThis will be an open-label randomized, controlled trial conducted at Women's College Hospital comparing five formulations of nitrates for their effects on bone turnover markers and headache. We will recruit postmenopausal women age 50 years or older with no contraindications to nitroglycerin. Our trial will consist of a run-in phase and a treatment phase. We will enroll 420 women in the run-in phase, each to receive all of the 5 potential treatments in random order for 2 days, each with a 2-day washout period between treatments. Those who tolerate all formulations will enter the 12-week treatment phase and be randomly assigned to one of five groups: 0.3 mg sublingual nitroglycerin tablet, 0.6 mg of the sublingual tablet, a 20 mg tablet of isosorbide mononitrate, a 160 mg nitroglycerin transdermal patch (used for 8 h), and 15 mg of nitroglycerin ointment as used in a previous trial by our group. We will continue enrolment until we have randomized 210 women or 35 women per group. Concentrations of bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide) and bone resorption (C-telopeptides of collagen crosslinks and N-terminal crosslinks of collagen) agents will be measured in samples taken at study entry (the start of the run in phase) and 12 weeks. Subjects will record the frequency and severity of headaches daily during the run-in phase and then monthly after that. We will use the 'multiple comparisons with the best' approach for data analyses, as this strategy allows practical considerations of ease of use and tolerability to guide selection of the preparation for future studies. DISCUSSION: Data from this protocol will be used to develop a randomized, controlled trial of nitrates to prevent osteoporotic fractures.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01387672. Controlled-Trials.com: ISRCTN08860742.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, SublingualAge FactorsBiomarkersBone and BonesBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingChemistry, PharmaceuticalClinical ProtocolsFemaleHeadacheHumansIsosorbide DinitrateMiddle AgedBiomarkersBone Density Conservation Agentsisosorbide-5-mononitrateIsosorbide DinitrateNitratesNitroglycerinOintmentsTablets

Identifiers

PMID24010992
PMCPMC3847792
OpenAlexW2114517034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.