Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24010671›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2013

Effects of hydration on steric and electric charge-induced interstitial volume exclusion--a model.

Alf H Øien, Sigrid R Justad, Olav Tenstad, Helge Wiig

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Electric Factors in Wound Healing.Advances in wound care · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alf H ØienDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sigrid R Justad
Olav Tenstad
Helge Wiig
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of collagen and charged macromolecules like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in the interstitial space limits the space available for plasma proteins and other macromolecules. This phenomenon, known as interstitial exclusion, is of importance for interstitial fluid volume regulation. Physical/mathematical models are presented for calculating the exclusion of electrically charged and neutral macromolecules that equilibrate in the interstitium under various degrees of hydration. Here, a central hypothesis is that the swelling of highly electrically charged GAGs with increased hydration shields parts of the neutral collagen of the interstitial matrix from interacting with electrically charged macromolecules, such that exclusion of charged macromolecules exhibits change due to steric and charge effects. GAGs are also thought to allow relatively small neutral, but also charged macromolecules neutralized by a very high ionic strength, diffuse into the interior of GAGs, whereas larger macromolecules may not. Thus, in the model, relatively small electrically charged macromolecules, such as human serum albumin, and larger neutral macromolecules such as IgG, will have quite similar total volume exclusion properties in the interstitium. Our results are in agreement with ex vivo and in vivo experiments, and suggest that the charge of GAGs or macromolecular drugs may be targeted to increase the tissue uptake of macromolecular therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

ElectronsModels, BiologicalExtracellular FluidExtracellular MatrixGlycosaminoglycansGlycosaminoglycans1-particles2-particles3-particlesAA [as subscript]albumin- or macromolecules in general [also as subscript]availableavailable volume of charged particleavailable volume of small neutral macroparticleavailable volume per unit volume for large neutral macroparticlesaverage volume density of macromolecules, as albumin, in cellaxial length of equilibration cellcharge part per unit volume of excluded volumecircular cross-section area of equilibration cellcollagen particles [also as subscript]core radius of GAGd1, d2 = 2H(z), d3dCLDCL(z)Debye lengthdiameters of 1-, 2-, and 3-particlesdistance between two side-by-side GAGs- or collagen particle centersdistance of closest approach in albumin-albumin interactionsdistance of closest approach in GAG-albumin interactionseffective density of collagen particleselectrical charge on particle Iexcluded volume per unit volume for large neutral macroparticlesexcluded volume per unit volume of charged macroparticleexcluded volume per unit volume of small neutral macroparticleGAGs, glycosaminoclycans [also as subscript]highest thickness valuehydrationH(z)inside cell tissue [also as subscript]lLlowest thickness valuen1inN1inn1T(z), n1O(z)n2, n3n3eff(z)number densities of 2- and 3-particlesnumber of macromolecules, as albumin, poured into cellOoutside cell tissue [also as subscript]outside tissue-cell volumep1pressure of 1-particlesQ(1), Q(2)rradial distanceradius of GAGs as function of tissue thicknessrminTthickness of tissue sampletissue-cell volumeVOvolume density of 1-particles in tissue, outside tissuevolume of collagen-, GAG- and macroparticle material per unit volume of tissuevolume of water per unit volume of tissue (water content)VTzz1z2ζλDνAνA0GνAOνEνE00νE0GνEOνH2OνQ

Identifiers

PMID24010671
PMCPMC3762347
OpenAlexW2092223356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.