Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24009792›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2013

A randomized trial of two coverage targets for mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma.

Sheila K West, Robin Bailey, Beatriz Munoz, Tansy Edwards, Harran Mkocha, Charlotte Gaydos, Thomas Lietman, Travis Porco, David Mabey, Thomas C Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Toward the Elimination of Disease: the 2019 Weisenfeld Award Lecture.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Models of Trachoma Transmission and Their Policy Implications: From Control to Elimination.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheila K WestDana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. shwest@jhmi.edu
Robin Bailey
Beatriz Munoz
Tansy Edwards
Harran Mkocha
Charlotte Gaydos
Thomas Lietman
Travis Porco
David Mabey
Thomas C Quinn
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBJohns Hopkins University · USSan Francisco Foundation · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Immunopathogenesis Of Chlamydia trachomatis InfectionZIAAI000358 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI QUINN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2022
$7.0M
Intramural NIH HHSMedical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends at least 3 annual antibiotic mass drug administrations (MDA) where the prevalence of trachoma is > 10% in children ages 1-9 years, with coverage at least at 80%. However, the additional value of higher coverage targeted at children with multiple rounds is unknown. TRIAL

design2 × 2 factorial community randomized, double blind, trial. TRIAL

methods32 communities with prevalence of trachoma ≥ 20% were randomized to: annual MDA aiming for coverage of children between 80%-90% (usual target) versus aiming for coverag e> 90% (enhanced target); and to: MDA for three years versus a rule of cessation of MDA early if the estimated prevalence of ocular C. trachomatis infection was less than 5%. The primary outcome was the community prevalence of infection with C. trachomatis at 36 months.

resultsOver the trial's course, no community met the MDA cessation rule, so all communities had the full 3 rounds of MDA. At 36 months, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of infection, 4.0 versus 5.4 (mean adjusted difference  = 1.4%, 95% CI  =  -1.0% to 3.8%), nor in the prevalence of trachoma, 6.1 versus 9.0 (mean adjusted difference  =  2.6%, 95% CI  =  -0.3% to 5.3%) comparing the usual target to the enhanced target group. There was no difference if analyzed using coverage as a continuous variable.

conclusionIn communities that had pre-treatment prevalence of follicular trachoma of 20% or greater, there is no evidence that MDA can be stopped before 3 annual rounds, even with high coverage. Increasing coverage in children above 90% does not appear to confer additional benefit.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePrevalenceTrachomaTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID24009792
PMCPMC3757067
OpenAlexW2160469607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.