ArticlePloS one2013
Comparative chloroplast genomes of camellia species.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis reveals genetic differentiation and maternal introgression in tea plants (Camellia sinensis) from Shaoyang, China.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The first complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of an invasive plantMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Woody oil crop domestication in the genusiScience · 2025Review
- Sequencing, Assembly, and Comparative Evolutionary Analysis of the Chloroplast Genome of Kenaf (Genes · 2025Article
- Plastomic insights into the genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships of Macadamia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Species concept of golden flower camellias in China.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Nine complete chloroplast genomes of the Camellia genus provide insights into evolutionary relationships and species differentiation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome and the Phylogenetic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in the Identification Methods of Food-Medicine Homologous Herbal Materials.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Phylotranscriptomics resolved phylogenetic relationships and divergence time between 20 golden camellia species.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes and Phylogenetic Relationships of 21 Sect.Genes · 2025Article
- PhytoKeys · 2025Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCamellia, comprising more than 200 species, is a valuable economic commodity due to its enormously popular commercial products: tea leaves, flowers, and high-quality edible oils. It is the largest and most important genus in the family Theaceae. However, phylogenetic resolution of the species has proven to be difficult. Consequently, the interspecies relationships of the genus Camellia are still hotly debated. Phylogenomics is an attractive avenue that can be used to reconstruct the tree of life, especially at low taxonomic levels. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsSeven complete chloroplast (cp) genomes were sequenced from six species representing different subdivisions of the genus Camellia using Illumina sequencing technology. Four junctions between the single-copy segments and the inverted repeats were confirmed and genome assemblies were validated by PCR-based product sequencing using 123 pairs of primers covering preliminary cp genome assemblies. The length of the Camellia cp genome was found to be about 157kb, which contained 123 unique genes and 23 were duplicated in the IR regions. We determined that the complete Camellia cp genome was relatively well conserved, but contained enough genetic differences to provide useful phylogenetic information. Phylogenetic relationships were analyzed using seven complete cp genomes of six Camellia species. We also identified rapidly evolving regions of the cp genome that have the potential to be used for further species identification and phylogenetic resolution. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, we wanted to determine if analyzing completely sequenced cp genomes could help settle these controversies of interspecies relationships in Camellia. The results demonstrate that cp genome data are beneficial in resolving species definition because they indicate that organelle-based "barcodes", can be established for a species and then used to unmask interspecies phylogenetic relationships. It reveals that phylogenomics based on cp genomes is an effective approach for achieving phylogenetic resolution between Camellia species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.