ArticlePloS one2013
A liposomal drug platform overrides peptide ligand targeting to a cancer biomarker, irrespective of ligand affinity or density.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liposomal DoxorubicinCurrent drug delivery · 2024Pooled it
- Application of active targeting nanoparticle delivery system for chemotherapeutic drugs and traditional/herbal medicines in cancer therapy: a systematic review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018Pooled it
- Advances in lipid-based carriers for cancer therapeutics: Liposomes, exosomes and hybrid exosomes.Cancer letters · 2023Article
- Identification of variable lymphocyte receptors that can target therapeutics to pathologically exposed brain extracellular matrix.Science advances · 2019Article
- Non-Covalent Assembly Method that Simultaneously Endows a Liposome Surface with Targeting Ligands, Protective PEG Chains, and Deep-Red Fluorescence Reporter Groups.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2017Article
- Investigating in vitro and in vivo αvβ6 integrin receptor-targeting liposomal alendronate for combinatory γδ T cell immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017Article
- Paradigm shift in bacteriophage-mediated delivery of anticancer drugs: from targeted 'magic bullets' to self-navigated 'magic missiles'.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2017Review
- Role of microRNA-4458 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- The impact of nanoparticle protein corona on cytotoxicity, immunotoxicity and target drug delivery.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2016Review
- Modular Three-component Delivery System Facilitates HLA Class I Antigen Presentation and CD8(+) T-cell Activation Against Tumors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2015Article
- The Effect of Bi-Terminal PEGylation of an Integrin αvβ₆-Targeted ¹⁸F Peptide on Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Uptake.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2015Article
- Active targeted drug delivery for microbes using nano-carriers.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2015Review
- Combinatorial synthesis and screening of cancer cell-specific nanomedicines targeted via phage fusion proteins.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Identification of a novel lysosomal trafficking peptide using phage display biopanning coupled with endocytic selection pressure.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2014Article
- Article
- Molecular imaging of integrin αvβ6 expression in living subjects.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One method for improving cancer treatment is the use of nanoparticle drugs functionalized with targeting ligands that recognize receptors expressed selectively by tumor cells. In theory such targeting ligands should specifically deliver the nanoparticle drug to the tumor, increasing drug concentration in the tumor and delivering the drug to its site of action within the tumor tissue. However, the leaky vasculature of tumors combined with a poor lymphatic system allows the passive accumulation, and subsequent retention, of nanosized materials in tumors. Furthermore, a large nanoparticle size may impede tumor penetration. As such, the role of active targeting in nanoparticle delivery is controversial, and it is difficult to predict how a targeted nanoparticle drug will behave in vivo. Here we report in vivo studies for αvβ6-specific H2009.1 peptide targeted liposomal doxorubicin, which increased liposomal delivery and toxicity to lung cancer cells in vitro. We systematically varied ligand affinity, ligand density, ligand stability, liposome dosage, and tumor models to assess the role of active targeting of liposomes to αvβ6. In direct contrast to the in vitro results, we demonstrate no difference in in vivo targeting or efficacy for H2009.1 tetrameric peptide liposomal doxorubicin, compared to control peptide and no peptide liposomes. Examining liposome accumulation and distribution within the tumor demonstrates that the liposome, and not the H2009.1 peptide, drives tumor accumulation, and that both targeted H2009.1 and untargeted liposomes remain in perivascular regions, with little tumor penetration. Thus H2009.1 targeted liposomes fail to improve drug efficacy because the liposome drug platform prevents the H2009.1 peptide from both actively targeting the tumor and binding to tumor cells throughout the tumor tissue. Therefore, using a high affinity and high specificity ligand targeting an over-expressed tumor biomarker does not guarantee enhanced efficacy of a liposomal drug. These results highlight the complexity of in vivo targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.