Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24009665›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Prevention of chronic kidney disease and subsequent effect on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Usman A Khan, Amit X Garg, Chirag R Parikh, Steven G Coca

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hyperkalemia in the Hypertensive Patient.Current cardiology reports · 2018
    Review
  7. Monocytic angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 relates to atherosclerosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Usman A KhanSection of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Program of Applied Translational Research, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Amit X Garg
Chirag R Parikh
Steven G Coca

Funding

Novel Biomarkers in Cardiac Surgery to Detect Acute Kidney InjuryR01HL085757 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PARIKH, CHIRAG R · 2007 to 2019
$10.3M
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC RENAL DISEASET32DK007276 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ARONSON, PETER S., CANTLEY, LLOYD G · 1986 to 2022
$9.3M
Mentoring Program for Translational and Patient Oriented Research in AKIK24DK090203 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PARIKH, CHIRAG R · 2012 to 2016
$896k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085757NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK090203NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to determine whether prevention or slowing of progression of chronic kidney disease would translate into improved mortality, and if so, the attributable risk due to CKD itself on mortality.

backgroundCKD is associated with increased mortality. This association is largely based on evidence from the observational studies and evidence from randomized controlled trials is lacking.

methodsWe searched Ovid, Medline and Embase for RCTs in which an intervention was given to prevent or slow the progression of CKD and mortality was reported as primary, secondary or adverse outcomes were eligible and selected. For the first phase, pooled relative risks for renal endpoints were assessed. For the second phase, we assessed the effect on mortality in trials of interventions that definitively reduced CKD endpoints.

resultsAmong 52 studies selected in first phase, only renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system blockade vs. placebo (n = 18 trials, 32,557 participants) met the efficacy criteria for further analysis in the second phase by reducing renal endpoints 15 to 27% compared to placebo. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.08) or CV death (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.21) between the treatment and control groups in these trials. There was sufficient statistical power to detect a 9% relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality and a 14% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality.

conclusionsFirm evidence is lacking that prevention of CKD translates into reductions in mortality. Larger trials with longer follow-up time are needed to determine the benefit of CKD prevention on survival.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionHumansOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk

Identifiers

PMID24009665
PMCPMC3756976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.