Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24009582›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroengineering2013

The blood-brain barrier: an engineering perspective.

Andrew D Wong, Mao Ye, Amanda F Levy, Jeffrey D Rothstein, Dwight E Bergles, Peter C Searson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroengineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 651 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Guidelines for Comparing Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy and Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Biomolecules.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Towards Precise Modelling of Diffusion Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D WongDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA ; Institute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mao Ye
Amanda F Levy
Jeffrey D Rothstein
Dwight E Bergles
Peter C Searson
Johns Hopkins University · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been more than 100 years since Paul Ehrlich reported that various water-soluble dyes injected into the circulation did not enter the brain. Since Ehrlich's first experiments, only a small number of molecules, such as alcohol and caffeine have been found to cross the blood-brain barrier, and this selective permeability remains the major roadblock to treatment of many central nervous system diseases. At the same time, many central nervous system diseases are associated with disruption of the blood-brain barrier that can lead to changes in permeability, modulation of immune cell transport, and trafficking of pathogens into the brain. Therefore, advances in our understanding of the structure and function of the blood-brain barrier are key to developing effective treatments for a wide range of central nervous system diseases. Over the past 10 years it has become recognized that the blood-brain barrier is a complex, dynamic system that involves biomechanical and biochemical signaling between the vascular system and the brain. Here we reconstruct the structure, function, and transport properties of the blood-brain barrier from an engineering perspective. New insight into the physics of the blood-brain barrier could ultimately lead to clinical advances in the treatment of central nervous system diseases.

Indexed as

blood-brain barriercapillarymicrovasculatureneurovascular unittransport

Identifiers

PMID24009582
PMCPMC3757302
OpenAlexW2030588597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.