ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2013
NeuroLex.org: an online framework for neuroscience knowledge.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Automated meta-analysis of the event-related potential (ERP) literature.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Modeling sources of interlaboratory variability in electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Pooled it
- Improving data sharing and knowledge transfer via the Neuroelectrophysiology Analysis Ontology (NEAO).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- A large public dataset of annotated clinical MRIs and metadata of patients with acute stroke.Scientific data · 2023Article
- NeuroML-DB: Sharing and characterizing data-driven neuroscience models described in NeuroML.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The past, present and future of neuroscience data sharing: a perspective on the state of practices and infrastructure for FAIR.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Review
- Extending and using anatomical vocabularies in the stimulating peripheral activity to relieve conditions project.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Project, toolkit, and database of neuroinformatics ecosystem: A summary of previous studies on "Frontiers in Neuroinformatics".Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Review
- Empowering Data Sharing and Analytics through the Open Data Commons for Traumatic Brain Injury Research.Neurotrauma reports · 2022Article
- Constructing the rodent stereotaxic brain atlas: a survey.Science China. Life sciences · 2022Review
- Seeing the Forest and Its Trees Together: Implementing 3D Light Microscopy Pipelines for Cell Type Mapping in the Mouse Brain.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Review
- An open-source framework for neuroscience metadata management applied to digital reconstructions of neuronal morphology.Brain informatics · 2020Article
- FAIR SCI Ahead: The Evolution of the Open Data Commons for Pre-Clinical Spinal Cord Injury Research.Journal of neurotrauma · 2020Review
- Species Classification for Neuroscience Literature Based on Span of Interest Using Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Model.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- A Text Mining Pipeline Using Active and Deep Learning Aimed at Curating Information in Computational Neuroscience.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Neuron Names: A Gene- and Property-Based Name Format, With Special Reference to Cortical Neurons.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019Article
- Developing a healthcare dataset information resource (DIR) based on Semantic Web.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Brain Cell Type Specific Gene Expression and Co-expression Network Architectures.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Brain maps 4.0-Structure of the rat brain: An open access atlas with global nervous system nomenclature ontology and flatmaps.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to transmit, organize, and query information digitally has brought with it the challenge of how to best use this power to facilitate scientific inquiry. Today, few information systems are able to provide detailed answers to complex questions about neuroscience that account for multiple spatial scales, and which cross the boundaries of diverse parts of the nervous system such as molecules, cellular parts, cells, circuits, systems and tissues. As a result, investigators still primarily seek answers to their questions in an increasingly densely populated collection of articles in the literature, each of which must be digested individually. If it were easier to search a knowledge base that was structured to answer neuroscience questions, such a system would enable questions to be answered in seconds that would otherwise require hours of literature review. In this article, we describe NeuroLex.org, a wiki-based website and knowledge management system. Its goal is to bring neurobiological knowledge into a framework that allows neuroscientists to review the concepts of neuroscience, with an emphasis on multiscale descriptions of the parts of nervous systems, aggregate their understanding with that of other scientists, link them to data sources and descriptions of important concepts in neuroscience, and expose parts that are still controversial or missing. To date, the site is tracking ~25,000 unique neuroanatomical parts and concepts in neurobiology spanning experimental techniques, behavioral paradigms, anatomical nomenclature, genes, proteins and molecules. Here we show how the structuring of information about these anatomical parts in the nervous system can be reused to answer multiple neuroscience questions, such as displaying all known GABAergic neurons aggregated in NeuroLex or displaying all brain regions that are known within NeuroLex to send axons into the cerebellar cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.