Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24009522›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

The enhancer landscape during early neocortical development reveals patterns of dense regulation and co-option.

Aaron M Wenger, Shoa L Clarke, James H Notwell, Tisha Chung, Geetu Tuteja, Harendra Guturu, Bruce T Schaar, Gill Bejerano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptional network orchestrating regional patterning of cortical progenitors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron M WengerDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Shoa L Clarke
James H Notwell
Tisha Chung
Geetu Tuteja
Harendra Guturu
Bruce T Schaar
Gill Bejerano
Stanford University · US

Funding

Computational & Functional Annotation of the Zebrafish Genome Regulatory ToolboxR01HG005058 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AHITUV, NADAV, BEJERANO, GILL · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005058NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies have identified a core set of transcription factors and target genes that control the development of the neocortex, the region of the human brain responsible for higher cognition. The specific regulatory interactions between these factors, many key upstream and downstream genes, and the enhancers that mediate all these interactions remain mostly uncharacterized. We perform p300 ChIP-seq to identify over 6,600 candidate enhancers active in the dorsal cerebral wall of embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) mice. Over 95% of the peaks we measure are conserved to human. Eight of ten (80%) candidates tested using mouse transgenesis drive activity in restricted laminar patterns within the neocortex. GREAT based computational analysis reveals highly significant correlation with genes expressed at E14.5 in key areas for neocortex development, and allows the grouping of enhancers by known biological functions and pathways for further studies. We find that multiple genes are flanked by dozens of candidate enhancers each, including well-known key neocortical genes as well as suspected and novel genes. Nearly a quarter of our candidate enhancers are conserved well beyond mammals. Human and zebrafish regions orthologous to our candidate enhancers are shown to most often function in other aspects of central nervous system development. Finally, we find strong evidence that specific interspersed repeat families have contributed potentially key developmental enhancers via co-option. Our analysis expands the methodologies available for extracting the richness of information found in genome-wide functional maps.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMiceNeocortexOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsZebrafishTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24009522
PMCPMC3757057
OpenAlexW2047405190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.