Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24009008›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2013

Cerebrovascular autoregulation after rewarming from hypothermia in a neonatal swine model of asphyxic brain injury.

Abby C Larson, Jessica L Jamrogowicz, Ewa Kulikowicz, Bing Wang, Zeng-Jin Yang, Donald H Shaffner, Raymond C Koehler, Jennifer K Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abby C LarsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jessica L Jamrogowicz
Ewa Kulikowicz
Bing Wang
Zeng-Jin Yang
Donald H Shaffner
Raymond C Koehler
Jennifer K Lee
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Therapeutic Strategies for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemiic EncephalopathyR01NS060703 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KOEHLER, RAYMOND CHARLES · 2008 to 2019
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-060703NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After hypoxic brain injury, maintaining blood pressure within the limits of cerebral blood flow autoregulation is critical to preventing secondary brain injury. Little is known about the effects of prolonged hypothermia or rewarming on autoregulation after cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that rewarming would shift the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA), that this shift would be detected by indices derived from near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and that rewarming would impair autoregulation during hypertension. Anesthetized neonatal swine underwent sham surgery or hypoxic-asphyxic cardiac arrest, followed by 2 h of normothermia and 20 h of hypothermia, with or without rewarming. Piglets were further divided into cohorts for cortical laser-Doppler flow (LDF) measurements during induced hypotension or hypertension. We also tested whether indices derived from NIRS could identify the LDF-derived LLA. The LLA did not differ significantly among groups with sham surgery and hypothermia (29 ± 8 mmHg), sham surgery and rewarming (34 ± 7 mmHg), arrest and hypothermia (29 ± 10 mmHg), and arrest and rewarming (38 ± 11 mmHg). The LLA was not affected by arrest (P = 0.60), temperature (P = 0.08), or interaction between arrest and temperature (P = 0.73). The NIRS-derived indices detected the LLA accurately, with the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves of 0.81-0.96 among groups. In groups subjected to arrest and hypothermia, with or without rewarming, the slope of LDF relative to cerebral perfusion pressure during hypertension was not significantly different from zero (P > 0.10). In conclusion, rewarming did not shift the LLA during hypotension or affect autoregulation during hypertension after asphyxic cardiac arrest. The NIRS-derived autoregulation indices identified the LLA accurately.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationHypothermia, InducedRewarmingAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAsphyxia NeonatorumBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureDisease Models, AnimalHomeostasisHypertensionHypotensionHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainLaser-Doppler FlowmetrySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSwinecardiac arrestcerebral blood flownear-infrared spectroscopyneonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathypig

Identifiers

PMID24009008
PMCPMC3841826
OpenAlexW2087104516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.