Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24008998›Full record

ReviewGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2013

Some experiences and opportunities for big data in translational research.

Christopher G Chute, Mollie Ullman-Cullere, Grant M Wood, Simon M Lin, Min He, Jyotishman Pathak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mouse Injury Model of Polytrauma and Shock.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Big Data Analytics for Genomic Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. -Omic and Electronic Health Record Big Data Analytics for Precision Medicine.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2017
    Review
  14. A Framework for Data Quality Assessment in Clinical Research Datasets.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher G ChuteDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mollie Ullman-Cullere
Grant M Wood
Simon M Lin
Min He
Jyotishman Pathak

Funding

Genomic Basis of Susceptibility to COVID-19 Infection and its ComplicationsU01HG006379 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Richard R. Sharp · 2011 to 2026
$16.5M
National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
IRIS: Incorporating Research Into SightU01HG006389 · NHGRI · ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH · PI MCCARTY, CATHERINE ANNE · 2011 to 2014
$4.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006379NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG 006389NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006389NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG 06379NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care has become increasingly information intensive. The advent of genomic data, integrated into patient care, significantly accelerates the complexity and amount of clinical data. Translational research in the present day increasingly embraces new biomedical discovery in this data-intensive world, thus entering the domain of "big data." The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics consortium has taught us many lessons, while simultaneously advances in commodity computing methods enable the academic community to affordably manage and process big data. Although great promise can emerge from the adoption of big data methods and philosophy, the heterogeneity and complexity of clinical data, in particular, pose additional challenges for big data inferencing and clinical application. However, the ultimate comparability and consistency of heterogeneous clinical information sources can be enhanced by existing and emerging data standards, which promise to bring order to clinical data chaos. Meaningful Use data standards in particular have already simplified the task of identifying clinical phenotyping patterns in electronic health records.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsGenetic TestingGenetics, MedicalGenomicsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMeaningful UseMedical InformaticsPhenotypeTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID24008998
PMCPMC3906918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.