Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24008902›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2013

Invited commentary: Off-roading with social epidemiology--exploration, causation, translation.

M Maria Glymour, Theresa L Osypuk, David H Rehkopf

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting mortality from 57 economic, behavioral, social, and psychological factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Big Data's Role in Precision Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Commentary: Epidemiology in the era of big data.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Maria Glymour
Theresa L Osypuk
David H Rehkopf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population health improvements are the most relevant yardstick against which to evaluate the success of social epidemiology. In coming years, social epidemiology must increasingly emphasize research that facilitates translation into health improvements, with continued focus on macro-level social determinants of health. Given the evidence that the effects of social interventions often differ across population subgroups, systematic and transparent exploration of the heterogeneity of health determinants across populations will help inform effective interventions. This research should consider both biological and social risk factors and effect modifiers. We also recommend that social epidemiologists take advantage of recent revolutionary improvements in data availability and computing power to examine new hypotheses and expand our repertoire of study designs. Better data and computing power should facilitate underused analytic approaches, such as instrumental variables, simulation studies and models of complex systems, and sensitivity analyses of model biases. Many data-driven machine-learning approaches are also now computationally feasible and likely to improve both prediction models and causal inference in social epidemiology. Finally, we emphasize the importance of specifying exposures corresponding with realistic interventions and policy options. Effect estimates for directly modifiable, clearly defined health determinants are most relevant for building translational social epidemiology to reduce disparities and improve population health.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSocial EnvironmentEpidemiologyHumansSociology, Medicalcausal inferenceeffect modificationexploratory analysesmachine learningpopulation healthsocial epidemiologytranslational research

Identifiers

PMID24008902
PMCPMC6903782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.