Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24008427›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2014

Comparison of two kinds of interface, based on guided navigation or usability principles, for improving the adoption of computerized decision support systems: application to the prescription of antibiotics.

Rosy Tsopra, Jean-Philippe Jais, Alain Venot, Catherine Duclos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Clinical pathways for primary care: current use, interest and perceived usability.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  15. Higher accuracy of complex medication reconciliation through improved design of electronic tools.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosy TsopraLIM&BIO, EA3969, F93000 Université, Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France.
Jean-Philippe Jais
Alain Venot
Catherine Duclos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIt is important to consider the way in which information is presented by the interfaces of clinical decision support systems, to favor the adoption of these systems by physicians. Interface design can focus on decision processes (guided navigation) or usability principles.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare these two approaches in terms of perceived usability, accuracy rate, and confidence in the system. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe displayed clinical practice guidelines for antibiotic treatment via two types of interface, which we compared in a crossover design. General practitioners were asked to provide responses for 10 clinical cases and the System Usability Scale (SUS) for each interface. We assessed SUS scores, the number of correct responses, and the confidence level for each interface.

resultsSUS score and percentage confidence were significantly higher for the interface designed according to usability principles (81 vs 51, p=0.00004, and 88.8% vs 80.7%, p=0.004). The percentage of correct responses was similar for the two interfaces. DISCUSSION/

conclusionThe interface designed according to usability principles was perceived to be more usable and inspired greater confidence among physicians than the guided navigation interface. Consideration of usability principles in the construction of an interface--in particular 'effective information presentation', 'consistency', 'efficient interactions', 'effective use of language', and 'minimizing cognitive load'--seemed to improve perceived usability and confidence in the system.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersUser-Computer InterfaceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedHumansPhysicians, FamilyPractice Guidelines as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescriptionPhysicians, Primary carePractice guidelineUsabilityUser-computer interface

Identifiers

PMID24008427
PMCPMC3957402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.