ArticleBMC cancer2013
Validation of four candidate pancreatic cancer serological biomarkers that improve the performance of CA19.9.
Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Extracellular Matrix Signatures from In-Depth Proteomic Profiling that Correlate with Lymphocyte Infiltration.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer From Non-Cancerous Pancreatic Disease Using Dielectrophoresis-Recovered Nanoparticles Carrying Cell-Free DNA and Protein Biomarkers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1, syncollin and thrombospondin-2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis differentiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Proteomic meta-analysis unveils new frontiers for biomarkers research in pancreatic carcinoma.Oncogenesis · 2025Review
- Machine learning-optimized metabolic biomarker panel for precision screening of early-stage pancreatic cancer in new-onset diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Multibiomarker panels in liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic cancer - a comprehensive review.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
- Identification of activity-based biomarkers for early-stage pancreatic tumors in blood using single-molecule enzyme activity screening.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Anterior gradient proteins in gastrointestinal cancers: from cell biology to pathophysiology.Oncogene · 2022Review
- Application of Proteomics in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Biomarker Investigations: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- An Integrated Data Analysis of mRNA, miRNA and Signaling Pathways in Pancreatic Cancer.Biochemical genetics · 2021Article
- Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Are we closer to finding the golden ticket?World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- The Case for GNMT as a Biomarker and a Therapeutic Target in Pancreatic Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Current State of "Omics" Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- A combination of urinary biomarker panel and PancRISK score for earlier detection of pancreatic cancer: A case-control study.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
- Pancreatic duct ligation reduces premalignant pancreatic lesions in a Kras model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in mice.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Secretion of pro-oncogenic AGR2 protein in cancer.Heliyon · 2020Review
- Systemic Proteome Alterations Linked to Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer in Diabetic Patients.Cancers · 2020Article
- Advances on diagnostic biomarkers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systems biology perspective.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Integrated transcriptomic analysis reveals hub genes involved in diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of laminin gene family for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Aging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of new serum biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity is an important priority in pancreatic cancer research. Through an extensive proteomics analysis of pancreatic cancer cell lines and pancreatic juice, we previously generated a list of candidate pancreatic cancer biomarkers. The present study details further validation of four of our previously identified candidates: regenerating islet-derived 1 beta (REG1B), syncollin (SYCN), anterior gradient homolog 2 protein (AGR2), and lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2).
methodsThe candidate biomarkers were validated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in two sample sets of serum/plasma comprising a total of 432 samples (Sample Set A: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n = 100), healthy (n = 92); Sample Set B: PDAC (n = 82), benign (n = 41), disease-free (n = 47), other cancers (n = 70)). Biomarker performance in distinguishing PDAC from each control group was assessed individually in the two sample sets. Subsequently, multiparametric modeling was applied to assess the ability of all possible two and three marker panels in distinguishing PDAC from disease-free controls. The models were generated using sample set B, and then validated in Sample Set A.
resultsIndividually, all markers were significantly elevated in PDAC compared to healthy controls in at least one sample set (p ≤ 0.01). SYCN, REG1B and AGR2 were also significantly elevated in PDAC compared to benign controls (p ≤ 0.01), and AGR2 was significantly elevated in PDAC compared to other cancers (p < 0.01). CA19.9 was also assessed. Individually, CA19.9 showed the greatest area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis when compared to the tested candidates; however when analyzed in combination, three panels (CA19.9 + REG1B (AUC of 0.88), CA19.9 + SYCN + REG1B (AUC of 0.87) and CA19.9 + AGR2 + REG1B (AUC of 0.87)) showed an AUC that was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that of CA19.9 alone (AUC of 0.82). In a comparison of early-stage (Stage I-II) PDAC to disease free controls, the combination of SYCN + REG1B + CA19.9 showed the greatest AUC in both sample sets, (AUC of 0.87 and 0.92 in Sets A and B, respectively).
conclusionsAdditional serum biomarkers, particularly SYCN and REG1B, when combined with CA19.9, show promise as improved diagnostic indicators of pancreatic cancer, which therefore warrants further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.