Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24006922›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2013

Population structure of Wolbachia and cytoplasmic introgression in a complex of mosquito species.

Emilie Dumas, Célestine M Atyame, Pascal Milesi, Dina M Fonseca, Elena V Shaikevich, Sandra Unal, Patrick Makoundou, Mylène Weill, Olivier Duron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ecotypes,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Insects · 2025
    Article
  5. EuropeanInsects · 2024
    Article
  6. Viruses · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetic diversity of endosymbiotic bacteriaFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NativeFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Studies on the fitness characteristics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Experimental evidence ofCurrent zoology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Symbiotic Interactions Between Mosquitoes and Mosquito Viruses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Emilie DumasInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution, UMR5554 CNRS, Université Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France. olivier.duron@univ-montp2.fr.
Célestine M Atyame
Pascal Milesi
Dina M Fonseca
Elena V Shaikevich
Sandra Unal
Patrick Makoundou
Mylène Weill
Olivier Duron
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRCentre de Recherche et de Veille sur les Maladies Emergentes dans l’Océan Indien · FRRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVavilov Institute of General Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe maternally inherited bacterium Wolbachia often acts as a subtle parasite that manipulates insect reproduction, resulting potentially in reproductive isolation between host populations. Whilst distinct Wolbachia strains are documented in a group of evolutionarily closely related mosquitoes known as the Culex pipiens complex, their impact on mosquito population genetics remains unclear. To this aim, we developed a PCR-RFLP test that discriminates the five known Wolbachia groups found in this host complex. We further examined the Wolbachia genetic diversity, the variability in the coinherited host mitochondria and their partitioning among members of the Cx. pipiens complex, in order to assess the impact of Wolbachia on host population structure.

resultsThere was a strong association between Wolbachia and mitochondrial haplotypes indicating a stable co-transmission in mosquito populations. Despite evidence that members of the Cx. pipiens complex are genetically distinct on the basis of nuclear DNA, the association of Wolbachia and mtDNA with members of the Cx. pipiens complex were limited. The Wolbachia wPip-I group, by far the most common, was associated with divergent Cx. pipiens members, including Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. pipiens pipiens form pipiens and Cx. pipiens pipiens form molestus. Four other wPip groups were also found in mosquito populations and all were shared between diverse Cx. pipiens members.

conclusionThis data overall supports the hypothesis that wPip infections, and their allied mitochondria, are associated with regular transfers between Cx. pipiens members rather than specific host associations. Overall, this is suggestive of a recent and likely ongoing cytoplasmic introgression through hybridization events across the Cx. pipiens complex.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionCulexDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationHaplotypesPolymerase Chain ReactionWolbachiaDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID24006922
PMCPMC3846486
OpenAlexW2054946868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.