Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24006395›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2013

Student learning about biomolecular self-assembly using two different external representations.

Gunnar E Höst, Caroline Larsson, Arthur Olson, Lena A E Tibell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A 3D-printed Sanger sequencing activity addresses student misconceptions.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 3D Printing of Molecular Models.The Journal of biocommunication · 2016
    Article
  7. Crystallographic education in the 21st century.Journal of applied crystallography · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gunnar E HöstDepartment of Science and Technology, Linköping University, SE-601 74 Norrköping, Sweden. gunnar.host@liu.se
Caroline Larsson
Arthur Olson
Lena A E Tibell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-assembly is the fundamental but counterintuitive principle that explains how ordered biomolecular complexes form spontaneously in the cell. This study investigated the impact of using two external representations of virus self-assembly, an interactive tangible three-dimensional model and a static two-dimensional image, on student learning about the process of self-assembly in a group exercise. A conceptual analysis of self-assembly into a set of facets was performed to support study design and analysis. Written responses were collected in a pretest/posttest experimental design with 32 Swedish university students. A quantitative analysis of close-ended items indicated that the students improved their scores between pretest and posttest, with no significant difference between the conditions (tangible model/image). A qualitative analysis of an open-ended item indicated students were unfamiliar with self-assembly prior to the study. Students in the tangible model condition used the facets of self-assembly in their open-ended posttest responses more frequently than students in the image condition. In particular, it appears that the dynamic properties of the tangible model may support student understanding of self-assembly in terms of the random and reversible nature of molecular interactions. A tentative difference was observed in response complexity, with more multifaceted responses in the tangible model condition.

Indexed as

LearningStudentsBiochemistryEducational MeasurementMacromolecular SubstancesSwedenTeachingTemperatureWritingMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID24006395
PMCPMC3763014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.