Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24006130›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2014

Creating living cellular machines.

Roger D Kamm, Rashid Bashir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Morphological, Behavioral, and Transcriptomic Life Cycle of Anthrobots.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Open problems in synthetic multicellularity.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  6. Ethics and responsibility in biohybrid robotics research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Motile Living Biobots Self-Construct from Adult Human Somatic Progenitor Seed Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Biohybrid Design Gets Personal: New Materials for Patient-Specific Therapy.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Engineering geometrical 3-dimensional untethered in vitro neural tissue mimic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roger D KammMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, rdkamm@mit.edu.
Rashid Bashir
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Microfluidic 3D Assays for Metastatic CancerR33CA174550 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KAMM, ROGER D · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA174550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of increasingly complex integrated cellular systems will be a major challenge for the next decade and beyond, as we apply the knowledge gained from the sub-disciplines of regenerative medicine, synthetic biology, micro-fabrication and nanotechnology, systems biology, and developmental biology. In this prospective, we describe the current state-of-the-art in the assembly of source cells, derived from pluripotent cells, into populations of a single cell type to produce the components or building blocks of higher order systems and finally, combining multiple cell types, possibly in combination with scaffolds possessing specific physical or chemical properties, to produce higher level functionality. We also introduce the issue, questions and ample research opportunities to be explored by others in the field. As these "living machines" increase in capabilities, exhibit emergent behavior and potentially reveal the ability for self-assembly, self-repair, and even self-replication, questions arise regarding the ethical implications of this work. Future prospects as well as ways of addressing these complex ethical questions will be discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansPluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineSynthetic BiologyTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID24006130
PMCPMC4307756
OpenAlexW2164738193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.