Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2014
Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer.
Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a single-center prospective phase II study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Does three-dimensional surgery affect recurrence patterns in patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic R0 gastrectomy? Results from a 3-year follow-up phase III trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- The artificial intelligence revolution in gastric cancer management: clinical applications.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of OGT-Assisted Overlap Oesophagojejunostomy Versus the Traditional Overlap Method in Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction (G/GEJ) Tumours.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Advantages of a robotic approach compared with laparoscopy gastrectomy for patients with high visceral fat area.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Comparisons of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I/IIA gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Current Status and Trends of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Korea.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Hybrid Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.Journal of gastric cancer · 2021Article
- Robotic Gastrectomy Compared with Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I/II Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- The 140 years' journey of gastric cancer surgery: From the two hands of Billroth to the multiple hands of the robot.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- Preventive effect on delayed gastric emptying of preserving the infra-pyloric vein in laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Obesity is a risk factor for internal hernia after laparoscopic or robot-assisted gastrectomy with mesenteric defect closure for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Observational
- Robotic radical lymphadenectomy without touching the pancreas during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Medicine · 2019Article
- Robotic gastrointestinal surgery.Current problems in surgery · 2018Review
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2018Article
- Robotic oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Article
- Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) is increasingly performed in Japan and Korea and is thought to have many advantages over laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, a prospective study investigating the safety of RADG has never been reported. The present study evaluated the safety of RADG with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer.
methodsThis single-center, prospective phase II study included patients with clinical stage IA gastric cancer located within the lower two-thirds of the stomach. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal infectious complications including anastomotic leakage, pancreas-related infection, and intraabdominal abscess. The secondary endpoints included all in-hospital adverse events, RADG completion rate, and survival outcome.
resultsFrom May 2012 to November 2012, 18 eligible patients were enrolled for this study. The incidence of intraabdominal infectious complication was 0 % (90 % CI, 0-12.0 %). The overall incidence of in-hospital adverse events was 22.2 % (90 % CI, 8.0-43.9 %). No patient required conversion to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy; thus, the RADG completion rate was 100 %.
conclusionsThis early phase II study suggested that RADG might be a safe and feasible procedure for stage IA gastric cancer, providing experienced surgeons perform the surgery. This conclusion should be clarified in subsequent late phase II studies with a larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.