Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24005835›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2013

Inhibition of angiogenesis for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Aaron S Mansfield, Svetomir N Markovic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron S MansfieldDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA, mansfield.aaron@mayo.edu.
Svetomir N Markovic
Mayo Clinic · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic malignant melanoma is a uniformly fatal disease. Tumor growth and metastasis are associated with angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Proangiogenic factors are associated with higher disease burdens and worse outcomes in melanoma. Accordingly, many agents that target angiogenesis have been studied in melanoma. Angiogenesis is a complex, multifaceted process with many potential therapeutic targets. So far, monoclonal antibodies, immune conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and other therapies have been tested in the phase 2 or phase 3 setting for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The antiangiogenic agents that have been tested to date offer little activity as single agents, but in combination with cytotoxic agents prolong progression-free survival. We explore data from published phase 2 and phase 3 trials in addition to the purported mechanisms of action of antiangiogenic agents.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansMelanomaNeovascularization, PathologicVascular Endothelial Growth FactorsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalVascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID24005835
OpenAlexW2088913145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.