ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2013
[Current legal framework conditions for running and utilization of biobanks. Part 2: data protection and informed consent].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microwave ablation for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review of clinical efficacy and safety.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- [Complications in surgery: Topic of the year 2015 in Der Chirurg].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Article
- [Current legal framework conditions for running and utilization of biobanks: Part 3: ownership and rights of use].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informed consent of donors of biomaterials represents an essential pillar of legal conformity of business organizations even for biobanks. For the assessment of self-determination of donors and freedom of research for users of biobanks there is a general consensus on the necessity for a social and individual agreement for the participation of donors in research projects. However, demands are often made for which the legal implementation is at least contentious and can be considered as excessive and biased. In part 2 of this review series the current legal foundation of data protection and informed consent is summarized on the basis of normative and ethical principles. With respect to appropriation of data and biosamples it can be deduced that by conformation to corresponding framework conditions the informed consent of donors in particular can be constructed independent of the project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24005718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.