Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24004955›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Comparative analysis of the complete genome of an epidemic hospital sequence type 203 clone of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Margaret M C Lam, Torsten Seemann, Nicholas J Tobias, Honglei Chen, Volker Haring, Robert J Moore, Susan Ballard, Lindsay M Grayson, Paul D R Johnson, Benjamin P Howden and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterisation ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  5. Genomic epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Eastern Denmark from 2020 to 2022, and identification of vanB Tn1549 insertion sites.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Deciphering vancomycin resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Multisite Detection of TnAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  11. Emergence and Transmission of Daptomycin and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Between Patients and Hospital Rooms.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Detection of vancomycin-resistantGenome research · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Complete Genome Sequences of Isolates ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margaret M C LamDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia. tstinear@unimelb.edu.au.
Torsten Seemann
Nicholas J Tobias
Honglei Chen
Volker Haring
Robert J Moore
Susan Ballard
Lindsay M Grayson
Paul D R Johnson
Benjamin P Howden
Timothy P Stinear

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this report we have explored the genomic and microbiological basis for a sustained increase in bloodstream infections at a major Australian hospital caused by Enterococcus faecium multi-locus sequence type (ST) 203, an outbreak strain that has largely replaced a predecessor ST17 sequence type.

resultsTo establish a ST203 reference sequence we fully assembled and annotated the genome of Aus0085, a 2009 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) bloodstream isolate, and the first example of a completed ST203 genome. Aus0085 has a 3.2 Mb genome, comprising a 2.9 Mb circular chromosome and six circular plasmids (2 kb-130 kb). Twelve percent of the 3222 coding sequences (CDS) in Aus0085 are not present in ST17 E. faecium Aus0004 and ST18 E. faecium TX16. Extending this comparison to an additional 12 ST17 and 14 ST203 E. faecium hospital isolate genomes revealed only six genomic regions spanning 41 kb that were present in all ST203 and absent from all ST17 genomes. The 40 CDS have predicted functions that include ion transport, riboflavin metabolism and two phosphotransferase systems. Comparison of the vancomycin resistance-conferring Tn1549 transposon between Aus0004 and Aus0085 revealed differences in transposon length and insertion site, and van locus sequence variation that correlated with a higher vancomycin MIC in Aus0085. Additional phenotype comparisons between ST17 and ST203 isolates showed that while there were no differences in biofilm-formation and killing of Galleria mellonella, ST203 isolates grew significantly faster and out-competed ST17 isolates in growth assays.

conclusionsHere we have fully assembled and annotated the first ST203 genome, and then characterized the genomic differences between ST17 and ST203 E. faecium. We also show that ST203 E. faecium are faster growing and can out-compete ST17 E. faecium. While a causal genetic basis for these phenotype differences is not provided here, this study revealed conserved genetic differences between the two clones, differences that can now be tested to explain the molecular basis for the success and emergence of ST203 E. faecium.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationGenome, BacterialVancomycin ResistanceAnimalsAustraliaDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsEnterococcus faeciumHumansMothsPhenotypePlasmidsSequence Analysis, DNAVirulenceDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID24004955
PMCPMC3846456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.