Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24004882›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Visual cue training to improve walking and turning after stroke: a study protocol for a multi-centre, single blind randomised pilot trial.

Kristen L Hollands, Trudy Pelton, Andrew Wimperis, Diane Whitham, Sue Jowett, Catherine Sackley, Wing Alan, Paulette van Vliet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01600391 (Visual Cue Training to Improve Walking and Turning After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01600391 nacompletednot on this map

Visual Cue Training to Improve Walking and Turning After Stroke: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SalfordRan2012 to 2014Enrolled60ConditionsStrokeArmsUsual care, Overground visual cue training, Treadmill visual cue training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Ladder Treadmill: A Method to Assess Locomotion in Cats with an Intact or Lesioned Spinal Cord.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristen L HollandsResearch Fellow School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Allerton Building, Salford M6 6PU, UK. k.hollands@salford.ac.uk.
Trudy Pelton
Andrew Wimperis
Diane Whitham
Sue Jowett
Catherine Sackley
Wing Alan
Paulette van Vliet
University of Birmingham · GBMoseley Hall Hospital · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBRMIT University · AUUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0609-18181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual information comprises one of the most salient sources of information used to control walking and the dependence on vision to maintain dynamic stability increases following a stroke. We hypothesize, therefore, that rehabilitation efforts incorporating visual cues may be effective in triggering recovery and adaptability of gait following stroke. This feasibility trial aims to estimate probable recruitment rate, effect size, treatment adherence and response to gait training with visual cues in contrast to conventional overground walking practice following stroke. METHODS/

designA 3-arm, parallel group, multi-centre, single blind, randomised control feasibility trial will compare overground visual cue training (O-VCT), treadmill visual cue training (T-VCT), and usual care (UC). Participants (n = 60) will be randomly assigned to one of three treatments by a central randomisation centre using computer generated tables to allocate treatment groups. The research assessor will remain blind to allocation. Treatment, delivered by physiotherapists, will be twice weekly for 8 weeks at participating outpatient hospital sites for the O-VCT or UC and in a University setting for T-VCT participants.Individuals with gait impairment due to stroke, with restricted community ambulation (gait speed <0.8m/s), residual lower limb paresis and who are able to take part in repetitive walking practice involving visual cues (i.e., no severe visual impairments, able to walk with minimal assistance and no comorbid medical contraindications for walking practice) will be included.The primary outcomes concerning participant enrolment, recruitment, retention, and health and social care resource use data will be recorded over a recruitment period of 18 months. Secondary outcome measures will be undertaken before randomisation (baseline), after the eight-week intervention (outcome), and at three months (follow-up). Outcome measures will include gait speed and step length symmetry; time and steps taken to complete a 180° turn; assessment of gait adaptability (success rate in target stepping); timed up and go; Fugl-Meyer lower limb motor assessment; Berg balance scale; falls efficacy scale; SF-12; and functional ambulation category. DISCUSSION: Participation and compliance measured by treatment logs, accrual rate, attrition, and response variation will determine sample sizes for an early phase randomised controlled trial and indicate whether a definitive late phase efficacy trial is justified.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT01600391.

Indexed as

CuesGaitPsychomotor PerformanceResearch DesignStroke RehabilitationVisual PerceptionWalkingClinical ProtocolsDisability EvaluationExercise TestExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansMobility LimitationPatient CompliancePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24004882
PMCPMC3846668
OpenAlexW2109026184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.