Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24004192›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014

Effects of biologic scaffolds on human stem cells and implications for CNS tissue engineering.

Peter M Crapo, Stephen Tottey, Peter F Slivka, Stephen F Badylak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Organs-on-chips: into the next decade.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Decellularization of Nervous Tissues and Clinical Application.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. A State-of-the-Art of Functional Scaffolds for 3D Nervous Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter M CrapoMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Stephen Tottey
Peter F Slivka
Stephen F Badylak
McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Cell Recruitment Induced by ECM Scaffold DegradationR01AR053603 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BADYLAK, STEPHEN F. · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS 5R01AR053603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic scaffolds composed of mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) promote constructive remodeling of tissues via mechanisms that include the recruitment of endogenous stem/progenitor cells, modulation of the host innate immune response, and influence of cell fate differentiation. Such scaffold materials are typically prepared by decellularization of source tissues and are prepared as sheets, powder, or hydrogels. It is plausible that ECM derived from an anatomically distinct tissue would have unique or specific effects on cells that naturally reside in this same tissue. The present study investigated the in vitro effect of a soluble form of ECM derived from central nervous system (CNS) tissue, specifically the spinal cord or brain, versus ECM derived from a non-CNS tissue; specifically, the urinary bladder on the behavior of neural stem cells (NSCs) and perivascular stem cells. All forms of ECM induce positive, mitogenic, and chemotactic effects at concentrations of approximately 100 μg/mL without affecting stem cell viability. CNS-derived ECMs also showed the ability to differentiate NSCs into neurons as indicted by βIII-tubulin expression in two-dimensional culture and neurite extension on the millimeter scale after 24 days of three-dimensional cultures in an ECM hydrogel. These results suggest that solubilized forms of ECM scaffold materials may facilitate the postinjury healing response in CNS tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCentral Nervous SystemChemotaxisExtracellular MatrixHumansNeural Stem CellsNeuritesSolubilitySus scrofaTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID24004192
PMCPMC3875189
OpenAlexW2052233465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.