Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24003856›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2013

Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Denise M Lautenbach, Kurt D Christensen, Jeffrey A Sparks, Robert C Green

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Psychological impacts of APOE genotype disclosure among Latinos in New York City: a randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise M LautenbachDivision of Genetics and.
Kurt D Christensen
Jeffrey A Sparks
Robert C Green

Funding

Trial of risk mangement for prevention of accelerated atherosclerosis in SLEP60AR047782 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KATZ, JEFFREY NEIL · 2001 to 2016
$18.8M
Integration of Whole Genome Sequencing into Clinical MedicineU01HG006500 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2012 to 2016
$11.5M
Novel Biomarkers and Prediction Models for Rheumatoid ArthritisR01AR049880 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI COSTENBADER, KAREN H, KARLSON, ELIZABETH W · 2003 to 2018
$8.7M
Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer's Disease (REVEAL IV)R01HG002213 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, ROBERT C. · 1999 to 2012
$7.6M
Genetic Predictors of Early Atherosclerosis in SLEK24AR052403 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KARLSON, ELIZABETH W · 2005 to 2014
$1.5M
Impact of Direct to Consumer Genetic TestingR01HG005092 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, ROBERT C., ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
Characterizing Communicating Genetic Risk Alzheimer'sK24AG027841 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2006 to 2010
$914k
Incidental Finding Preferences in Whole Genome Sequencing: A Randomized TrialF32HG006993 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHRISTENSEN, KURT DEREK · 2012 to 2013
$102k
NHGRI NIH HHS F32 HG006993NHGRI NIH HHS F32HG006993NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002213NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG002213NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005092NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005092NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006500NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG006500NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR052403NIAMS NIH HHS K24AR052403NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR047782NIAMS NIH HHS P60AR047782NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR049880NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR049880NIA NIH HHS K24 AG027841NIA NIH HHS K24AG027841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communicating genetic risk information in ways that maximize understanding and promote health is increasingly important given the rapidly expanding availability and capabilities of genomic technologies. A well-developed literature on risk communication in general provides guidance for best practices, including presentation of information in multiple formats, attention to framing effects, use of graphics, sensitivity to the way numbers are presented, parsimony of information, attentiveness to emotions, and interactivity as part of the communication process. Challenges to communicating genetic risk information include deciding how best to tailor it, streamlining the process, deciding what information to disclose, accepting that communications may have limited influence, and understanding the impact of context. Meeting these challenges has great potential for empowering individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles and improve public health, but will require multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationRisk AssessmentDiseaseGenomicsHumansRisk Reduction Behavior

Identifiers

PMID24003856
PMCPMC3862080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.