ReviewMissouri medicine
Eye on statins: A comprehensive review.
Review in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myasthenia Gravis Outcomes After Use of Statins and Other Contraindicated Treatments: Results From the French National Insurance Database.European journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- The Effect of Statins on Ocular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Improvement of hepatic bioavailability as a new step for the future of statin.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last 25 years, statins have demonstrated their safety from an ophthalmologic standpoint. Studies relating statin to cataract formation are insufficient to alter the usual and customary prescription of statins. If there is an association between statins and cataracts, it is weak and clinically insignificant. Prospective studies have not demonstrated a benefit of adding statin therapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), but these studies have not been adequately powered to detect moderate differences. A subset of patients with persistently elevated lipids despite taking statins may be at higher risk of developing wet ARMD. The use of statins for the prevention and/ or treatment of glaucoma patients warrants further prospective study. There is a possibility that statins may unmask or exacerbate myasthenia gravis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24003655PMC6179885W1633830694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.