Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24002783›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2013

Effect of atrial fibrillation ablation on myocardial function: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking analysis.

Felix Ceelen, Ross J Hunter, Redha Boubertakh, Wieland H Sommer, Marco Armbruster, Richard J Schilling, Steffen E Petersen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Heart deformation analysis: measuring regional myocardial velocity with MR imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016
    Article
  4. Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Felix CeelenAdvanced Cardiovascular Imaging, Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit at Barts, William Harvey Research Institute, The London Chest Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, Bonner Road, London, E2 9JX, UK, Felix.Ceelen@campus.lmu.de.
Ross J Hunter
Redha Boubertakh
Wieland H Sommer
Marco Armbruster
Richard J Schilling
Steffen E Petersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoration of sinus rhythm may result in an improvement of left heart function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) technique may help detect subtle wall-motion abnormalities. Consequently this study aimed to analyse existence and reversibility of subclinical cardiac dysfunction following atrial fibrillation ablation. 28 consecutive patients (mean age 61 years) with paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation. CMR imaging was done 3 (±3) days before and 3.4 (±1.1) months after ablation. Left heart function was determined by performing FT analysis. Statistical analysis included paired student's t test, random effects metaanalysis to assess the cohort's health status and Bland-Altman analysis. 17 patients (61%) were free from AF at follow-up. Bland-Altman analysis showed good coefficients of variation. Of all 195 parameters, 27 changed (14%): 9 improved significantly (5%), 12 worsened significantly (6%), whereas 6 parameters worsened not significantly (3%). 18 of 120 systolic parameters changed (15%), 14 worsened (12%), 4 improved (3%). In 9 of 75 diastolic parameters, values changed (12%): 5 improved (7%) and 4 worsened (5%). Meta-analysis revealed that our collective's FT values at baseline didn't differ significantly from healthy volunteers' values [Q values of 0.01 (p value 0.921) and 1.499 (p value 0.221)]. AF patients undergoing ablation appear to have near normal cardiac wall motion, which does not improve following successful ablation. Feature tracking analysis is a reliable tool to determine treatment effects but is more likely to show positive findings if the population is unhealthy.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationMagnetic Resonance ImagingVentricular Function, LeftAgedAtrial FibrillationDiastoleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesPulmonary VeinsRecovery of FunctionSystoleTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.