Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24002595›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

'Being there' for women with metastatic breast cancer: a pan-European patient survey.

V Harding, M Afshar, J Krell, R Ramaswami, C J Twelves, J Stebbing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Support for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients-a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Support and care needs among Mexican women with metastatic breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and Validation of the Polish Version of Questionnaire for the Assessment of Psychosocial and Functional Effects of Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Differences in perception of breast cancer treatment between patients, physicians, and nurses and unmet information needs in Japan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V HardingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, 1st Floor, E Wing, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
M Afshar
J Krell
R Ramaswami
C J Twelves
J Stebbing

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14549Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-053Medical Research Council G1100425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding their experiences of diagnosis is integral to improving the quality of care for women living with advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

methodsA survey, initiated in March 2011, was conducted in two stages. First, the views of 47 breast cancer-related patient groups in eight European countries were sought on standards of breast cancer care and unmet needs of patients. Findings were used to develop a patient-centric survey to capture personal experiences of advanced breast cancer to determine insights into the 'trade-off' between extending overall survival and side effects associated with its treatment. The second online survey was open to women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, or their carers, and responders were recruited through local patient groups. Data were collected via anonymous local language questionnaires.

resultsThe online stage II survey received a total of 230 responses from 17 European countries: 94% of respondents had locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and 6% were adult carers. Although the overall experience of care was generally good/excellent (77%), gaps were still perceived in terms of treatment choice and information provision. Treatment choice for patients was felt to be lacking by 32% of responders. In addition, 68% of those who responded would have liked more information about future medical treatments and research, with 57% wishing to receive this information from their oncologist. Two-thirds (66%) of women with advanced breast cancer, or their carers, believed life-extending treatment to be important so that they can spend more time with family and friends, and 67% said that the treatment was worthwhile, despite potential associated side effects.

conclusionThese findings show a continuing need to provide women with advanced breast cancer with better information and emphasise the importance that these patients often place on prolonging survival.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsData CollectionEuropeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24002595
PMCPMC3777001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.