ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2013
Volumetric stratification of cT4 stage head and neck cancer.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- External Validation of Pre-Treatment Primary Tumor Volume as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Treated With (Chemo)Radiotherapy.Head & neck · 2026Article
- Tumor Volume Staging Provides a Comparable Stratifying for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer According to T Stages.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023Article
- Primary tumor volume and prognosis for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- A Novel System for Estimating Residual Disease and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2016Article
- The role of tumor volume in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2014Review
- The effect of tumor volume on radiotherapy outcome and correlation with other prognostic factors in patients with T2 supraglottic cancer.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocoregionally advanced stage head and neck cancer (HNC) is known for unfavorable outcome with only ~ 40-50% 3-year overall survival (OS). Clinical T4 stage includes a wide range of tumor burden. The lack of further nonsurgical subgrouping of cT4 stage makes intercenter outcome of irradiated cohorts difficult. Aim of this analysis was to further stratify cT4 stage HNC using volumetric staging. MATERIAL AND
methodsBetween January 2002 and January 2013, a total of 201 cT4 stage squamous cell cancer (SCC) HNC patients referred to our center for curative definitive radiation were consecutively irradiated. Radiation was performed using modulated techniques. Total gross tumor volumes (tGTV: primary+nodal tumor volume) of all patients have retrospectively been stratified using a prospectively evaluated volumetric staging system which bases on 3 cut-offs (15/70/130 ml), translating into 4 prognostic subgroups [V1: 1-15 ml (n=15), V2: 16-70 ml (108), V3: 71-130 ml (62), V4: >130 ml (16)]. OS, disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated.
resultsThe mean/median follow-up was 31/23 months (range 1-116 months). The 3-year OS, DFS, LRC, and DMFS rates of the entire cohort were 63, 44, 48, and 77%, respectively. Volumetric staging revealed its potential to prognostically statistically significantly divide the cT4 cohort into 4 volume subgroups (V1/2/3/4): OS: 90%/72%/58%/18%; DFS: 83%/50%/39%/10%; LRC: 81%/53%/47%/15%; DMFS: 93%/90%/70%/41%, all p<0.0001.
conclusionVolumetric staging allowed a highly statistically significant stratification of cT4 HNC stages into prognostic subgroups, which offers the chance of better intercenter comparability of irradiated advanced stage HNC cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.