Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24001517›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2014

You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record.

Jason J Saleem, Mindy E Flanagan, Alissa L Russ, Carmit K McMullen, Leora Elli, Scott A Russell, Katelyn J Bennett, Marianne S Matthias, Shakaib U Rehman, Mark D Schwartz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Field Investigation of Ambulatory Clinic Exam Room Design with respect to Computing Devices: A Pilot Study.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ambulatory Clinic Exam Room Design with respect to Computing Devices: A Laboratory Simulation Study.IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Paper versus EHR: simplistic comparisons may not capture current reality.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jason J SaleemHuman Factors, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Veterans Health Administration, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mindy E Flanagan
Alissa L Russ
Carmit K McMullen
Leora Elli
Scott A Russell
Katelyn J Bennett
Marianne S Matthias
Shakaib U Rehman
Mark D Schwartz
Richard M Frankel

Funding

HSRD VA CDA 10-034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Challenges persist on how to effectively integrate the electronic health record (EHR) into patient visits and clinical workflow, while maintaining patient-centered care. Our goal was to identify variations in, barriers to, and facilitators of the use of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) EHR in ambulatory care workflow in order better to understand how to integrate the EHR into clinical work. We observed and interviewed 20 ambulatory care providers across three geographically distinct VA medical centers. Analysis revealed several variations in, associated barriers to, and facilitators of EHR use corresponding to different units of analysis: computer interface, team coordination/workflow, and organizational. We discuss our findings in the context of different units of analysis and connect variations in EHR use to various barriers and facilitators. Findings from this study may help inform the design of the next generation of EHRs for the VA and other healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAmbulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedElectronic Health RecordsHumansInterviews as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsClinical documentationElectronic health recordsProvider-patient communicationWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID24001517
PMCPMC3957404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.