Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24001457›Full record

Trial reportNeuroImage2014

Affective traits link to reliable neural markers of incentive anticipation.

Charlene C Wu, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin, Kiefer Katovich, Brian Knutson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Effects of methamphetamine on two measures of reward: Euphoria and neural activation to reward cues.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Lithium modulates striatal reward anticipation and prediction error coding in healthy volunteers.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Approach- and Avoidance-Motivated Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlene C WuPsychology and Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Kiefer Katovich
Brian Knutson

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM IN AFFECTIVE SCIENCET32MH020006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GROSS, JAMES J, JOHNSON, SHERI L · 1998 to 2018
$5.9M
CORE--PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTP30AG017253 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATTACHARYA, JAY · 1999 to 2019
$5.8M
Anticipation of Reward and Risk Across the LifespanR21AG030778 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KNUTSON, BRIAN · 2007 to 2008
$493k
Neuromodulation of Motivated Cognition and Decision Making Across AdulthoodK99AG042596 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SAMANEZ LARKIN, GREGORY R · 2012 to 2012
$86k
Incentive learning and decision making in the aging brainF31AG032804 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAMANEZ LARKIN, GREGORY R · 2008 to 2010
$77k
Imaging the Human Reward System Across the Adult Life SpanF32AG039131 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SAMANEZ LARKIN, GREGORY R · 2011 to 2012
$53k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG032804NIA NIH HHS F31-AG032804NIA NIH HHS F32 AG039131NIA NIH HHS F32-AG039131NIA NIH HHS K99 AG042596NIA NIH HHS K99-AG042596NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017253NIA NIH HHS P30-AG017253NIA NIH HHS R21 AG030778NIA NIH HHS R21-AG030778NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020006NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH020006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While theorists have speculated that different affective traits are linked to reliable brain activity during anticipation of gains and losses, few have directly tested this prediction. We examined these associations in a community sample of healthy human adults (n=52) as they played a Monetary Incentive Delay task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). Factor analysis of personality measures revealed that subjects independently varied in trait Positive Arousal and trait Negative Arousal. In a subsample (n=14) retested over 2.5years later, left nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activity during anticipation of large gains (+$5.00) and right anterior insula activity during anticipation of large losses (-$5.00) showed significant test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations>0.50, p's<0.01). In the full sample (n=52), trait Positive Arousal correlated with individual differences in left NAcc activity during anticipation of large gains, while trait Negative Arousal correlated with individual differences in right anterior insula activity during anticipation of large losses. Associations of affective traits with neural activity were not attributable to the influence of other potential confounds (including sex, age, wealth, and motion). Together, these results demonstrate selective links between distinct affective traits and reliably-elicited activity in neural circuits associated with anticipation of gain versus loss. The findings thus reveal neural markers for affective dimensions of healthy personality, and potentially for related psychiatric symptoms.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAffectAgedAnticipation, PsychologicalArousalBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNerve NetReference ValuesReinforcement, PsychologyAccumbensAffectFMRIInsulaPunishmentReward

Identifiers

PMID24001457
PMCPMC3849140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.