Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24001251›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2013

The economic impact of project MARS (motivating adolescents to reduce sexual risk).

Bern C Dealy, Brady P Horn, Tiffany J Callahan, Angela D Bryan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. How to value safety in economic evaluations in health care? A review of applications in different sectors.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bern C DealyDepartment of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
Brady P Horn
Tiffany J Callahan
Angela D Bryan
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Alcohol Use and HIV Risk: An InterventionR01AA013844 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI BRYAN, ANGELA · 2002 to 2013
$4.4M
ELIMINATING HEALTH INEQUITIES THROUGH RESEARCH EDUCATION AND MENTORSHIPP20MD004996 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI VALDEZ, ROBERT OTTO · 2009 to 2010
$2.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS 2R01AA013844NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013844NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD004996NIMHD NIH HHS P20MD004996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to economically evaluate Project MARS (Motivating Adolescents to Reduce Sexual Risk; T. J. Callahan, E. A. Montanaro, R. E. Magnan, & A. D. Bryan, 2013, "Project MARS: Design of a multi-behavior intervention trial for justice-involved youth," Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 3, pp. 122-130), an ongoing, randomized, sexual-risk-reduction intervention for justice-involved youth. We consider the effect of including viral STIs in the economic analysis, and explore the impact of the MARS intervention on the perceived cost of acquiring STIs to justice-involved youth.

method206 participants, ages 14 to 18, participated in a sexual-risk-reduction intervention that included screening and treatment for chlamydia and gonorrhea. A Bernoulli probability model was used to estimate averted STIs attributable to the MARS intervention. The economic benefit of averted STIs was monetized using the direct medical cost of treatment. In addition, we used a contingent valuation (willingness-to-pay) model to investigate the impact of the Project MARS on participants' perceived cost of acquiring an STI.

resultsUsing the standard outcome domains typically used to evaluate STI interventions, Project MARS resulted in a reduction of $2.08 in direct medical costs for every $1 spent. When viral STIs were added to the economic model, a considerable increase in averted direct medical costs ($2.68 for every $1 spent) was found. Preliminary contingent valuation estimates suggest that participants' willingness-to-pay for averted STIs significantly increased after receiving the MARS intervention.

conclusionFrom an economic perspective, Project MARS is a worthwhile program to adopt. Future attention should be given to the impact of behavioral interventions on viral infections.

Indexed as

MotivationRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJuvenile DelinquencyMaleModels, EconomicProgram EvaluationSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24001251
PMCPMC9053167
OpenAlexW2122378650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.