Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24001187›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2013

Analysis, evaluation and adaptation of the ReTransQoL: a specific quality of life questionnaire for renal transplant recipients.

Davy Beauger, Stéphanie Gentile, Elisabeth Jouve, Bertrand Dussol, Christian Jacquelinet, Serge Briançon

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of the psychometrics properties of a French quality of life questionnaire among a cohort of renal transplant recipients less than one year.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davy BeaugerFaculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Santé Publique, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille EA 3279, France. davy.beauger@ap-hm.fr.
Stéphanie Gentile
Elisabeth Jouve
Bertrand Dussol
Christian Jacquelinet
Serge Briançon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnd stage renal disease (ESRD) profoundly impacts the lives of patients. Kidney transplantation provides the greatest health-related quality of life (HRQOL) improvement. Its measurement has become an important outcome parameter and a very important criterion in the evaluation of any type of medical treatment, especially in the field of renal transplantation.In 2007, a specific self-administered questionnaire for renal transplant recipients was developed in the French language: the ReTransQol (RTQ).After 5 years of use, the properties of the RTQ needed to be re-evaluated in a larger sample.This paper describes the analysis of the ReTransQol and its adaptation to achieve an improved and revised version.

methodsThe study design included three analysis phases for two samples of adult renal transplant recipients which came from two cross-sectional multicenter studies carried out in France in 2007 and 2012. Psychometrics properties like construct validity, acceptability and feasibility, reliability and convergent validity were evaluated and every analysis resulted in a new version of the questionnaire: the RTQ V2. The construct validity of the new RTQ was assessed with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis on a large sample of patients.

resultsThe study samples included 1,059 patients and 1,591 patients, respectively. After a principal component analysis, item reduction was performed and a total of 13 items were deleted. A final version of the RTQ V2 was created and comprised of 32 items describing 5 domains: Physical Health, Social Functioning, Medical Care, Treatment and Fear of Losing Graft.The explained variance between the first and second RTQ versions improved from 46.3% to 53.1%. All psychometric properties of RTQ V2 were satisfactory: IIC >0.4, IDV (%) of 100% and Cronbach's Alpha >0.7 in every dimension. The confirmatory analysis showed that the overall scalability of the RTQ V2 was satisfactory; all items showed a good fit to the Rasch model within each dimension, and showed INFIT statistics inside the acceptable range.

conclusionsPsychometric properties allow this new version of the questionnaire to be used to assess different specific dimensions for the renal transplant population, more effectively than previously possible.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFranceHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMulticenter Studies as TopicPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24001187
PMCPMC3766072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.