Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24001080›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia2013

Lessons from the RAMPART study--and which is the best route of administration of benzodiazepines in status epilepticus.

Robert Silbergleit, Daniel Lowenstein, Valerie Durkalski, Robin Conwit, NETT Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Rescue therapies for seizure emergencies: current and future landscape.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Midazolam: an essential palliative care drug.Palliative care and social practice · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert SilbergleitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, U.S.A. Robert.silbergleit@umich.edu
Daniel Lowenstein
Valerie Durkalski
Robin Conwit
NETT Investigators
Medical University of South Carolina · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Neurologic Emergencies Treatment Trials Network: Clinical Coordinating CenterU01NS056975 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARSAN, WILLIAM G · 2006 to 2015
$40.4M
Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Network Statistical and Data ManagementU01NS059041 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DURKALSKI, VALERIE L, PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2006 to 2015
$9.1M
Greater Philadelphia-Southern New Jersey NETT NetworkU10NS058960 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAREN, JILL MARJORIE · 2007 to 2016
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS 5U01NS056975-04NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS056975NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS059041NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS058960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early treatment of prolonged seizures with benzodiazepines given intravenously by paramedics in the prehospital setting had been shown to be associated with improved outcomes, but the comparative efficacy and safety of an intramuscular (IM) route, which is faster and consistently achievable, was previously unknown. RAMPART (the Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial) was a double-blind randomized clinical trial to determine if the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) midazolam is noninferior by a margin of 10% to that of intravenous (IV) lorazepam in patients treated by paramedics for status epilepticus (SE). In children and adults with >5 min of convulsions and who are still seizing at paramedic arrival, midazolam administered by IM autoinjector was noninferior to IV lorazepam on the primary efficacy outcome with comparable safety. Patients treated with IM midazolam were more likely to have stopped seizing at emergency department (ED) arrival, without emergency medical services (EMS) rescue therapy, and were less likely to require any hospitalization or admission to an intensive care unit. Lessons from the RAMPART study's findings and potential implications on clinical practice, on the potential role of other routes of administration, on the effect of timing of interventions, and on future clinical trials are discussed.

Indexed as

Drug Administration RoutesAdultAllied Health PersonnelAnticonvulsantsBenzodiazepinesChildDouble-Blind MethodEmergency Medical ServicesHumansInjections, IntramuscularSeizuresStatus EpilepticusTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsBenzodiazepinesComparative efficacyEmergency medical servicesIntramuscularLorazepamMidazolam

Identifiers

PMID24001080
PMCPMC3767187
OpenAlexW1989611673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.