Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24001034›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2013

Computational analysis of the binding specificity of Gleevec to Abl, c-Kit, Lck, and c-Src tyrosine kinases.

Yen-Lin Lin, Benoît Roux

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. On Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery.Accounts of chemical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Is Structure-Based Drug Design Ready for Selectivity Optimization?Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yen-Lin LinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gordon Center for Integrative Science, The University of Chicago , 929 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
Benoît Roux
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Beagle: A Supercomputer for Computational Biology, Simulation, and Data AnalysisS10RR029030 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FOSTER, IAN · 2010 to 2010
$7.0M
Conformational Flexibility in Activation of Src-KinaseR01CA093577 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BENOIT ROUX · 2002 to 2026
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA093577NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093577NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029030NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029030-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gleevec, a well-known cancer therapeutic agent, is an effective inhibitor of several tyrosine kinases, including Abl and c-Kit, but displays less potency to inhibit closely homologous tyrosine kinases, such as Lck and c-Src. Because many structural features of the binding site are highly conserved in these homologous kinases, the molecular determinants responsible for the binding specificity of Gleevec remain poorly understood. To address this issue, free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) simulations with explicit solvent was used to compute the binding affinity of Gleevec to Abl, c-Kit, Lck, and c-Src. The results of the FEP/MD calculations are in good agreement with experiments, enabling a detailed and quantitative dissection of the absolute binding free energy in terms of various thermodynamic contributions affecting the binding specificity of Gleevec to the kinases. Dominant binding free energy contributions arises from the van der Waals dispersive interaction, compensating about two-thirds of the unfavorable free energy penalty associated with the loss of translational, rotational, and conformational freedom of the ligand upon binding. In contrast, the contributions from electrostatic and repulsive interactions nearly cancel out due to solvent effects. Furthermore, the calculations show the importance of the conformation of the kinase activation loop. Among the kinases examined, Abl provides the most favorable binding environment for Gleevec via optimal protein-ligand interactions and a small free energy cost for loss of the translational, rotational, and conformational freedom upon ligand binding. The FEP/MD calculations additionally reveal that Lck and c-Src provide similar nonbinding interactions with the bound-Gleevec, but the former pays less entropic penalty for the ligand losing its translational, rotational, and conformational motions to bind, examining the empirically observed differential binding affinities of Gleevec between the two Src-family kinases.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesBinding SitesCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseHumansImatinib MesylateLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)Molecular Dynamics SimulationNeoplasmsPiperazinesProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-ablProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyrimidinessrc-Family KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesCSK protein, humanCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseImatinib MesylateLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)PiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-ablProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyrimidinessrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24001034
PMCPMC4026022
OpenAlexW2327533467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.