Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24000273›Full record

ArticleCurrent directions in psychological science2012

Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules.

Richard N Aslin, Elissa L Newport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current directions in psychological science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A simple threshold captures the social learning of conventions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What's Surprising About Surprisal.Computational brain & behavior · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lexical Surprisal Shapes the Time Course of Syntactic Structure Building.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Flexible structure learning under uncertainty.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard N AslinUniversity of Rochester.
Elissa L Newport

Funding

Visual statistical learning in human infantsR01HD037082 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ASLIN, RICHARD N., NEWPORT, ELISSA L · 1999 to 2022
$6.1M
Structure and Acquisition of Signed and Spoken LanguagesR01DC000167 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI NEWPORT, ELISSA L · 1989 to 2007
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037082NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical learning is a rapid and robust mechanism that enables adults and infants to extract patterns of stimulation embedded in both language and visual domains. Importantly, statistical learning operates implicitly, without instruction, through mere exposure to a set of input stimuli. However, much of what learners must acquire about a structured domain consists of principles or rules that can be applied to novel inputs. Although it has been claimed that statistical learning and rule learning are separate mechanisms, here we review evidence and provide a unifying perspective that argues for a single mechanism of statistical learning that accounts for both the learning of the input stimuli and the generalization to novel instances. The balance between instance-learning and generalization is based on two factors: the strength of perceptual biases that highlight structural regularities, and the consistency of unique versus overlapping contexts in the input.

Indexed as

generalizationinfantsrule learningstatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID24000273
PMCPMC3758750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.