Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24000102›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2014

Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection in general surgery in a developing country.

Emine Alp, Ferhan Elmali, Safiye Ersoy, Can Kucuk, Mehmet Doganay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Nosocomial Infection Rate: A Case of Iran.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Application of antimicrobial drugs in perioperative surgical incision.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emine AlpDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Infection Control Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey, ealp@erciyes.edu.tr.
Ferhan Elmali
Safiye Ersoy
Can Kucuk
Mehmet Doganay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) according to risk factors, etiological agents, antimicrobial resistance rates of pathogens, and antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in a developing country.

methodsProspective surveillance of SSIs was carried out in general surgery (GS) units between May 2005 and April 2009.

resultsSSI was diagnosed in 415 (10.8%) patients. Cefazolin was used as AMP in 780 (49%) operations, whereas broad-spectrum antibiotics were used in the remaining operations. AMP was administered for >24 h in 69 and 64% of the GS patients. The most significant risk factors for SSI after GS were total parenteral nutrition, transfusion, and a drainage catheter. The most common pathogen was Escherichia coli, but all the isolated pathogens were multiresistant.

conclusionAMP is effective for reducing the risk of SSI; however, the prolonged use of AMP and broad-spectrum antibiotics may be associated with the emergence of resistant bacterial strains.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCathetersChildChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesDrainageDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.