Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013
Lidocaine 5 % patches as an effective short-term co-analgesic in cancer pain. Preliminary results.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02751619 (Preventive Application Of Lidocaine Patch In Adjunction To Intravenous Morphine Analgesia For Management Of Post-Thoracotomy Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preventive Application Of Lidocaine Patch In Adjunction To Intravenous Morphine Analgesia For Management Of Post-Thoracotomy Pain: Results Of A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- A Review on the Management of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Review
- Contrast bath therapy for neuropathic pain due to spinal nerve root compression by myeloma: a case report.Spinal cord series and cases · 2022Article
- Review
- Comparative Benefit-Risk Assessment for Lidocaine 700 mg Medicated Plaster and Pregabalin in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following a Structured Framework Approach.Pain and therapy · 2022Article
- Local Anesthetic Lidocaine and Cancer: Insight Into Tumor Progression and Recurrence.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Pain in cancer survivors.British journal of pain · 2014Article
- Cancer Pain Management: Comprehensive Assessment and Nonopioid Analgesics, Part 1.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the short-term efficacy and patients' subjective perception of the use of lidocaine 5 % patches for painful scars (post-thoracotomy and post-mastectomy) and pain caused by chest wall tumors.
methodsThis is a prospective, descriptive, non-controlled, non-randomized, open-label study of patients seen in the palliative care outpatient clinic. Demographic data, variables relating to the severity of the pain, and concomitant therapy both at the start and end of treatment, the need for interventional anesthetic techniques (IAT), patients' subjective perception and treatment-related side effects were all recorded.
resultsTwenty patients were included with a mean follow-up of 29.2 days. The treatment led to a statistically significant clinical improvement in pain severity. There was no clinically significant opioid dose escalation during the treatment period. Only three patients required IAT to relieve the pain. Sixty five percent of patients were very satisfied with the therapy. No systemic or local adverse events were reported.
conclusionsThe addition of lidocaine 5 % patches is effective in the short term for the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain accompanied by allodynia, whether deriving from a painful scar or chest wall tumor. These findings need to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials with larger samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.