Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23999770›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2013

A phase II clinical study of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for Japanese advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer patients.

Tomohiro Nishina, Yoshinao Takano, Tadamichi Denda, Hisateru Yasui, Koji Takeda, Takashi Ura, Taito Esaki, Yusuke Okuyama, Ken Kondo, Yasuo Takahashi and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/Capecitabine-Cetuximab Combination Therapy and Its Effects on K-Ras Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Tomohiro Nishina*National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Kou 160 Minamiumemotomachi, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0280, Japan. tnishina@shikoku-cc.go.jp.
Yoshinao Takano
Tadamichi Denda
Hisateru Yasui
Koji Takeda
Takashi Ura
Taito Esaki
Yusuke Okuyama
Ken Kondo
Yasuo Takahashi
Yasuyuki Sugiyama
Kei Muro
Aichi Cancer Center · JPChiba Cancer Center · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPSapporo National Hospital · JPSouthern Tohoku General Hospital · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn Japan, there had been no prospective clinical studies conducted in terms of modified FOLFOX6 + bevacizumab therapy. We performed a post-marketing Phase II multicenter clinical study to examine the efficacy and safety of this regimen as first-line therapy for Japanese patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.

methodsBevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously, and then oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) and levofolinate calcium (200 mg/m(2)) were infused intravenously over 2 h. Subsequently, a bolus dose of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) was injected, followed by infusion of 5-fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2)) for 46 h. This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks until 24 cycles unless there was disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. The primary end point was the response rate.

resultsAmong the 70 patients enrolled, two patients withdrew the study before treatment, and 68 patients were eligible for analysis of efficacy and safety. The response rate was 51.5% (95% confidence interval: 39.0-63.8%). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were 12.6 months (95% confidence interval: 10.4-14.5 months) and 28.5 months [95% confidence interval: 23.1 months-(not applicable)], respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths observed. The most common Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included neutropenia in 35.3% of the patients, peripheral neuropathy in 16.2% and hypertension in 16.2%. All adverse events were manageable and tolerable. The exploratory analysis of polymorphisms of three genes, ERCC1, XPD and GSTP1, did not show any trends in terms of correlation with the efficacy or safety of modified FOLFOX6 + bevacizumab therapy.

conclusionsModified FOLFOX6 + bevacizumab therapy was manageable and tolerable in Japanese patients, achieving a high response rate.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsian PeopleBevacizumabColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug Administration ScheduleEndonucleasesFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, humanERCC2 protein, humanFluorouracilGlutathione S-Transferase piGSTP1 protein, humanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Proteinbevacizumabcolorectal cancerFOLFOX

Identifiers

PMID23999770
PMCPMC3814899
OpenAlexW2125468170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.