ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2013
Immunohistochemical profile and morphology in triple - negative breast cancers.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Clinical Features at Incidence in Indian Patients With Breast Cancer.JCO global oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Validation of ancillary procedures on formalin liquid fixed aspiration cytologic samples: from minimum to maximum.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Review
- Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in the serum of patients with triple-negative breast carcinoma: prognostic value of this biomarker.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
- A Novel Subset of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers with Unique Histology and Immunohistochemical Expression.Iranian journal of pathology · 2022Article
- Complement inhibitor CSMD1 modulates epidermal growth factor receptor oncogenic signaling and sensitizes breast cancer cells to chemotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Article
- Molecular classification of breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Article
- Analysis of CK5/6 and EGFR and Its Effect on Prognosis of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Clinicopathological factors associated with novel prognostic markers for patients with triple negative breast cancer.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2019Article
- Therapeutic Implications of the Molecular and Immune Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2018Review
- Virus and tumor microenvironment induced ER stress and unfolded protein response: from complexity to therapeutics.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- Potential clinically useful prognostic biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: preliminary results of a retrospective analysis.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2018Article
- Genomic Landscape and Endocrine-Resistant Subgroup in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.Theranostics · 2018Article
- MT4-MMP and EGFR expression levels are key biomarkers for breast cancer patient response to chemotherapy and erlotinib.British journal of cancer · 2017Article
- The Apocrine Profile of Triple-negative Breast Carcinomas in Patients Aged 45 Years or Younger: favorable but rare features.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2016Article
- Clinicopathological Study of Triple Negative Breast Cancers.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Molecular subtypes of breast carcinoma in Saudi Arabia. A retrospective study.Saudi medical journal · 2016Observational
- Tamoxifen Action in ER-Negative Breast Cancer.Signal transduction insights · 2016Article
- Signalling to eIF4E in cancer.Biochemical Society transactions · 2015Review
- Expression of MAS1 in breast cancer.Cancer science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTriple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is defined by a lack of expression of the steroid hormone receptors (oestrogen and progesterone), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2). It is characterized by distinct molecular, histological and clinical features. It is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of a specific therapy. Our study was aimed at pathologically illustrating triple-negative breast carcinoma and at evaluating the expression of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) ,cytokeratin 5/6 (CK 5/6) and Ki-67 among triple-negative breast cancer cases. Further, we aimed to probe whether triple-negative phenotype could be a surrogate marker for the basal phenotype and to correlate the expression of the basal markers (CK 5/6 and EGFR) with the clinico-pathological prognostic parameters.
methodsThe expression of EGFR, CK 5/6 and Ki-67 were studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 50 triple-negative breast cancer cases. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A statistical analysis was implemented by using the SPSS version 20.0. The Chi-square test was conducted to assess the relationship between the immunohistochemical markers and other variables. The Fischer exact test was used when the expected cell counts were less than 5.
resultsThe women with triple-negative breast cancer were younger, with the adverse pathological characteristics of a high tumour grade, tumour necrosis, frequent nodal metastases and high proliferation. 37 (74%) of the 50 triple-negative breast carcinomas showed the expression of the basal markers (EGFR and /or CK 5/6). We observed a statistically significant association between the basal marker expression and the presence of tumour necrosis.
conclusionThe triple-negative breast cancers in our population harbour adverse pathobiological features and a five marker immunohistochemical panel can be reliably used to define the basal-like cancers. The "Triple-negative" status cannot be used as a surrogate for the "basal marker expression".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.