ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2013
Prevention of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: current controversies and clinical guidance.
Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nationwide multi-centre survey of 12,500 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A report of Indian Society of Gastroenterology Task Force on acute upper gastrointestinal bleed.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Should proton pump inhibitors be used for glucocorticoid-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding prevention in patients with autoimmune liver disease? A real-world cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients after antiplatelet therapy induced gastrointestinal bleeding: timing.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- NSAID, antiaggregant, and/or anticoagulant-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Is there any change in prophylaxis rate after a 10-year period?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Time to reappraise the therapeutic place of celecoxib.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2018Article
- Use of beta-blockers and risk of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a population-based case-control study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Recent advances in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding.F1000Research · 2017Review
- Prevalence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors among the general population and osteoarthritis patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Observational
- Present-day challenges and future solutions in postoperative pain management: results from PainForum 2014.Journal of pain research · 2016Article
- Methyl salicylate lactoside inhibits inflammatory response of fibroblast-like synoviocytes and joint destruction in collagen-induced arthritis in mice.British journal of pharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common medical emergency and associated with significant morbidly and mortality. The risk of bleeding from peptic ulceration and oesophagogastric varices can be reduced by appropriate primary and secondary preventative strategies. Helicobacter pylori eradication and risk stratification with appropriate gastroprotection strategies when used with antiplatelet drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in preventing peptic ulcer bleeding, whilst endoscopic screening and either nonselective beta blockade or endoscopic variceal ligation are effective at reducing the risk of variceal haemorrhage. For secondary prevention of variceal haemorrhage, the combination of beta blockade and endoscopic variceal ligation is more effective. Recent data on the possible interactions of aspirin and NSAIDs, clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and the increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events associated with all nonaspirin cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors have increased the complexity of choices for preventing peptic ulcer bleeding. Such choices should consider both the GI and cardiovascular risk profiles. In patients with a moderately increased risk of GI bleeding, a NSAID plus a PPI or a COX-2 selective agent alone appear equivalent but for those at highest risk of bleeding (especially those with previous ulcer or haemorrhage) the COX-2 inhibitor plus PPI combination is superior. However naproxen seems the safest NSAID for those at increased cardiovascular risk. Clopidogrel is associated with a significant risk of GI haemorrhage and the most recent data concerning the potential clinical interaction of clopidogrel and PPIs are reassuring. In clopidogrel-treated patients at highest risk of GI bleeding, some form of GI prevention is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.