Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23996498›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2014

Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Tod B Sloan, Paul Mongan, Clark Lyda, Antoun Koht

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06792474 (Influence of Lidocaine Infusion on Motor Evoked Potential Thresholds; a Single-center, Double-blinded, Randomized Trial for Patients Undergoing Spin Surgery With Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06792474 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Influence of Lidocaine Infusion on Motor Evoked Potential Thresholds; a Single-center, Double-blinded, Randomized Trial for Patients Undergoing Spin Surgery With Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled44ConditionsSpinal Disease, Anesthesia, Post Operative PainArmsLidocaine in Saline, Normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anesthesia and evoked responses in neurosurgery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tod B SloanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Anschutz Office West (AO1), MS 8202, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA, tod.sloan@ucdenver.edu.
Paul Mongan
Clark Lyda
Antoun Koht
University of Colorado Denver · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioids is frequently utilized for spinal surgery where somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) are monitored. Lidocaine infusions can contribute to antinociception and unconsciousness, thus allowing for a reduction in the total dose of propofol. We examined our recent experience with lidocaine infusions to quantify this effect. After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of propofol usage in propofol-opioid TIVA (with and without lidocaine) for spine cases monitored with SSEP and tcMEP over a 7 months period. The propofol infusion rate, cortical amplitudes of the SSEP (median nerve, posterior tibial nerve), amplitudes and stimulation voltage of the tcMEP (adductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior) were evaluated. The savings of propofol and sufentanil were estimated based on utilization in 50 milliliter (ml) bottles and 5 ml ampules, respectively. 129 cases were evaluated. Propofol infusion rates were reduced with lidocaine infusion from an average of 115-99 μg/kg/min (p = 0.00038) and sufentanil infusions from an average of 0.36-0.29 μg/kg/h (p = 0.0059). This reduction in propofol infusion was also seen when the cases were divided into anterior cervical, posterior cervical, or posterior thoraco-lumbar procedures. No significant differences in the cortical SSEP or tcMEP amplitudes or the tcMEP stimulation voltages used were observed. No complications were associated with the use of the lidocaine infusion. The total estimated drug savings included 104 50 ml bottles of propofol and 5 5 ml ampules of sufentanil. These cases indicate that a lidocaine infusion can be effectively utilized in spine surgery with SSEP and tcMEP monitoring as a means to reduce propofol and sufentanil usage without a negative effect on the monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationEvoked Potentials, MotorEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalLidocainePropofol

Identifiers

PMID23996498
OpenAlexW2029566838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.