Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23996419›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2013

Alcohol withdrawal prevention: a randomized evaluation of lorazepam and ethanol--a pilot study.

Joyce E Fullwood, Zhila Mostaghimi, Christopher B Granger, Jeffrey B Washam, Wanda Bride, Yanfang Zhao, Bradi B Granger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An academic-health service partnership in nursing: lessons from the field.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joyce E FullwoodCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Zhila Mostaghimi
Christopher B Granger
Jeffrey B Washam
Wanda Bride
Yanfang Zhao
Bradi B Granger
Duke University Hospital · US

Funding

Pilot Project for the DTMI CRA ProgramUL1RR024128 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT M · 2006 to 2010
$48.1M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024128-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol withdrawal syndrome, characterized by confusion, agitation, and hallucinations, decreases the safety of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Unexpected hospitalization and sudden cessation of alcohol consumption may increase in-hospital complications and length of stay and even precipitate death. PURPOSE: To perform a randomized evaluation of lorazepam and ethanol/lorazepam to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these 2 strategies for preventing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

methodsPatients (n = 57) with myocardial infarction were screened for alcohol dependence by using the CAGE questionnaire and randomized to treatment with lorazepam or ethanol with lorazepam. Demographics and complication rates were analyzed by using χ² tests (categorical variables) and t tests (continuous variables). Safety (composite complication rates) of the treatment strategy was evaluated by using the Fisher exact test, and length of stay by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

resultsSafety-associated complication rates (self-extubation, delirium tremens, reinfarction) did not differ between groups (24% lorazepam vs 18% ethanol; P = .56). Days spent in the cardiac intensive care unit (7% lorazepam vs 2% ethanol; P = .32) and overall hospital stay (6% lorazepam vs 6% ethanol; P = .72) did not differ between the 2 groups.

conclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that a randomized evaluation of treatment strategies to prevent complications associated with alcohol withdrawal in patients with acute myocardial infarction is safe and feasible.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdultAlcoholismCentral Nervous System DepressantsDrug Therapy, CombinationEthanolFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLorazepamMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolHypnotics and SedativesLorazepam

Identifiers

PMID23996419
PMCPMC4324835
OpenAlexW2150179756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.