Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23996382›Full record

ReviewHippocampus2013

Use it and boost it with physical and mental activity.

Donna L Korol, Paul E Gold, Claire J Scavuzzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippocampus, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. (ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donna L KorolDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
Paul E Gold
Claire J Scavuzzo

Funding

Pharmacokinetics, Bioavailability, and Metabolism/Daniel R. DoergeP50AT006268 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HELFERICH, WILLIAM G · 2010 to 2015
$7.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS P50 AT006268NCCIH NIH HHS P50AT006268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the now classic tenets of neuroscience is that the brain retains a substantial amount of structural and functional plasticity throughout adulthood and old age. Enriching experiences that stimulate physical and mental activity produce robust changes in subsequent behaviors, including learning and memory, that tap a wide range of neural systems. In this article, we review evidence for cognitive priming with physical and mental exercise through a memory systems lens and present brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling as one candidate neural mechanism for experience-dependent modulation of learning and memory. We highlight our recent findings showing that priming with voluntary exercise or with spontaneous alternation, a working memory task, enhances new learning of hippocampus-sensitive place, or striatum-sensitive response tasks. Blocking BDNF signaling with infusions of a BDNF receptor inhibitor into hippocampus or striatum just before training on place or response tasks, respectively, abrogated the benefits of priming regardless of the type of priming experience. These results suggest that enhanced BDNF signaling during learning may itself produce the cognitive benefits afforded by prior physical or mental activity.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCorpus StriatumHippocampusHumansLearningMaze LearningMemoryMotor ActivityNeuronal PlasticitySignal TransductionSystems BiologyBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorBDNFlearning strategymemory systemsplasticityvoluntary exercise

Identifiers

PMID23996382
PMCPMC8734651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.